1,267
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introductions

Advances in aquatic insect systematics and biodiversity in the Neotropics: introduction

&
Pages 89-93 | Received 21 Mar 2018, Accepted 22 May 2018, Published online: 20 Dec 2018

ABSTRACT

The Neotropical Region or Neotropics, contains vast expanses of rain forest and river systems representing some of the most biologically diverse ecosystems on Earth, but much of its resident biota remains undescribed and undocumented, and some of it is at risk of extirpation and extinction. Anthropogenic disturbances, especially deforestation, urbanization, and climate change, threaten the integrity of the Neotropics and its biodiversity. In the Neotropics, freshwater habitats are particularly susceptible to environmental stressors and freshwater species throughout the Neotropics have experienced marked declines greater than those of other groups when compared to marine and terrestrial systems. Advances in taxonomic descriptions, preparation of keys, and faunal assessments will aid future studies as well as conservation efforts.

The Neotropical Region, or Neotropics, occupies portions of Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and the extreme southern tip of Florida in the United States (), and can be subdivided further into several sub-regions and other biologically distinct units (Morrone Citation2014). This region is known for its vast expanses of rain forest and river systems representing some of the most biologically diverse ecosystems on the Earth. As noted by Tundisi and Matsumura-Tundisi (Citation2008), the Neotropics may contain the greatest number of plants and animals among all biogeographic regions. Anthropogenic disturbances, especially deforestation, urbanisation and climate change, threaten the integrity of the Neotropics and its biodiversity (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Citation2005; Cayuela et al. Citation2012). For example, Kehoe et al. (Citation2017) estimated that upwards of 30% of species richness and 31% of species abundance are at risk of loss in tropical areas due to intensification of agricultural stressors. This is problematic because most Neotropical biodiversity, especially invertebrates, remains undescribed and undocumented, and some of it is at risk of extirpation and extinction (Contrador, Kennedy, and Rozzi Citation2012).

Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Neotropical Region indicated by the shaded area.

Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Neotropical Region indicated by the shaded area.

Cayuela et al. (Citation2012) indicated that one of the main problems of conservation is the inadequate knowledge of descriptive taxonomy and the distribution of organisms, which is especially true for the Neotropics. Simple logic dictates that the more biodiversity is identified and described, the more likely conservation efforts aimed at protecting it will be successful. Indeed, the first step to effective conservation and development of sound management strategies is having an accurate inventory of the resource. Presently, there is a distinct risk that much of Neotropical biodiversity will be lost before it is described and inventoried. Furthermore, ecosystem services originating in the Neotropics are of immense economic and cultural value (Tundisi and Matsumura-Tundisi Citation2008; Williams and Williams Citation2017), and disruption or cessation of those services may yield substantial negative consequences.

Freshwater habitats are particularly susceptible to environmental stressors (Dijkstra, Monaghan, and Pauls Citation2014) and freshwater species throughout the Neotropics have experienced precipitous declines that are much greater when compared to marine and terrestrial systems (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Citation2005). Neotropical aquatic insects have received far less attention than plants and vertebrates, particularly, from a conservation perspective (Contrador et al. Citation2012). Aquatic insects are a fundamental and important component of Neotropical biodiversity. They are critical to the proper structure and functioning of lentic and lotic ecosystems. Their importance and applicability for assessing environmental stress in those systems as ecological indicators is crucial (Barbour, Gerritsen, Snyder, and Stribling Citation1999).

The taxonomic, phylogenetic and distributional status of many Neotropical aquatic-insect groups is increasingly improving (e.g., Parfin and Gurney Citation1956; Penny Citation1981, Citation2002; Hogue and Bedoya-Ortiz Citation1989; Contreras-Ramos Citation1998, Citation2005; Flint, Holzenthal, and Harris Citation1999; Costa Citation2000; Förster Citation2001; Heckman Citation2002, Citation2008; Domínguez, Molineri, Pescador, Hubbard, and Nieto Citation2006; Miller and Spangler Citation2008; de Souza Amorim Citation2009; Stark, Froehlich, and Zúñiga Citation2009; Vidotto-Magnoni and Carvalho Citation2009; Froehlich Citation2010; Garrison, von Ellenrieder, and Louton Citation2010; Megna and Epler Citation2012; Miller and Montano Citation2014; Short and García Citation2014; Liu, Hayashi, and Yang Citation2015; Short et al. Citation2015; Toledo and Michat Citation2015; Toussaint and Short Citation2016; Short, Cole, and Toussaint Citation2017). We do not attempt to list all published papers on individual aquatic insect taxa here because doing so would be impractical. Similarly, more ecological studies of aquatic insects are being published (e.g., Sites et al. Citation2003; Múrria et al. Citation2015; Ferreira et al. Citation2017; Gimenez Citation2017; Parreira de Castro et al. Citation2018) than we could possibly include here. However, the majority of the Neotropics remains unsurveyed.

This special issue contains nine papers that substantially advance our knowledge of Neotropical aquatic insects. The studies were conducted in Belize, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Panama, Guyana and the West Indies. Included papers address creeping water bugs (Heteroptera: Naucoridae), lance lacewings (Neuroptera: Osmyliidae), alderflies, dobsonflies and fishflies (Megaloptera), caddisflies (Trichoptera), beetles (Coleoptera: Dryopidae, Hydraenidae) and true flies (Diptera: Blephariceridae, Tanyderidae). The keys, taxonomic descriptions and faunal assessments presented in these papers represent substantial advances in those areas and will aid future studies as well as conservation efforts. In addition to augmenting regional distributional data and producing first descriptions of larval forms, these papers describe one new genus and seven new species. Several more potentially undescribed species are also identified. The information on aquatic insects presented in this issue will better facilitate their use and practical application in water quality assessment, and ecosystem-level studies.

Acknowledgements

We thank Taylor & Francis and Aquatic Insects for giving us the opportunity to prepare this special issue. In particular, we thank Alison Paskins, Helena Shaverdo, Praise Ann Catubay, Sara Griffiths and William Padgett for their assistance and patience on this project.

Disclosure statement

The views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations and data in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service.

References

  • Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D., and Stribling, J.B. (1999), Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrate, and Fish (2nd ed.), Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Cayuela, L., Gálvez-Bravo, L., Pérez, R., de Albuquerque, F.S., Golicher, D.J., Zahawi, R.A., Ramírez-Marcial, N., Garibaldi, C., Field, R., Rey Benayas, J.M., González-Espinosa, M., Balvanera, P., Ángel Castillo, M., Figueroa-Rangel, B.L., Griffith, D.M., Islebe, G.A., Kelly, D.L., Olvera-Vargas, M., Schnitzer, S.A., Velázquez, E., Williams-Linera, G., Brewer, S.W., Camacho-Cruz, A., Coronado, I., de Jong, B., del Castillo, R., Granzow-de la Cerda, I., Fernández, J., Fonseca, W., Galindo-Jaimes, L., Gillespie, T.W., González-Rivas, B., Gordon, J.E., Hurtado, J., Linares, J., Letcher, S.G., Mangan, S.A., Meave, J.A., Méndez, E.V., Meza, V., Ochoa-Gaona, S., Peterson, C.J., Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Snarr, K.A., Tun Dzul, F., Valdez-Hernández, M., Viergever, K.M., White, D.A., Williams, J.N., Bonet, F.J. and Zamora, R. (2012), ‘The Tree Biodiversity Network (BIOTREE-NET): Prospects for Biodiversity Research and Conservation in the Neotropics’, Biodiversity & Ecology, 4, 211–224.
  • Contrador, T.A., Kennedy, J.H., and Rozzi, R. (2012), ‘The Conservation Status of Southern South American Aquatic Insects in the Literature’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 2095–2107.
  • Contreras-Ramos, A. (1998), Systematics of the Dobsonfly Genus Corydalus (Megaloptera, Corydalidae), Maryland: Thomas Say Publications in Entomology, Monographs, Entomological Society of America.
  • Contreras-Ramos, A. (2005), ‘Recent Accounts on the Systematics and Biogeography of Neotropical Megaloptera (Corydalidae, Sialidae)’, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Neuropterology (20–23 June 2005), eds. R.A. Pantaleoni, A. Letardi and C. Corazza, Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, pp. 67–72.
  • Costa, C. (2000), ‘Estado de conocimiento de los Coleoptera neotropicales’, in PrIBES. Proyecto Iberoamericano de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática Zaragoza (Vol. 1, pp. 99–114), eds. F., Martín-Piera, J. J. Morrone, and A. Melic, Villa de Leyva, Colômbia: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa.
  • de Souza Amorim, D. (2009), ‘Neotropical Diptera Diversity: Richness, Patterns, and Perspectives’, in Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges And Tools, eds. D. Bickel, T. Pape, and R. Meier, Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, pp. 71–97.
  • Dijkstra, K.-D.B., Monaghan, M.T., and Pauls, S.U. (2014), ‘Freshwater Biodiversity and Aquatic Insect Diversification’, Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 143–163.
  • Domínguez, E., Molineri, C., Pescador, M., Hubbard, M.D., and Nieto, C. (2006). ‘Ephemeroptera of South America’, in Aquatic Biodiversity of Latin America (ABLA) (Vol. 2), eds. J. Adis, J.R. Arias, G. Rueda-Delgado, and K.M. Wantzen, Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft, pp. 646.
  • Ferreira, W.R., Hepp, L.U., Ligeiro, R., Macedo, D.R., Hughes, R.M., Kaufmann, P.R., and Callisto, M. (2017), ‘Partitioning Taxonomic Diversity of Aquatic Insect Assemblages and Functional Feeding Groups In Neotropical Savanna Headwater Streams’, Ecological Indicators, 72, 365–373.
  • Flint, O.S., Jr., Holzenthal, R.W., and Harris, S.C. (1999), Catalog of the Neotropical Caddisflies (Trichoptera), Columbus, OH: Special Publication, Ohio Biological Survey.
  • Förster, S. (2001), The Dragonflies of Central America Exclusive of Mexico and the West Indies. A Guide to Their Identification (2nd ed., Odonatological monographs 2), Braunschweig: Gunnar Rehfeld, pp. 141.
  • Froehlich, C.G. (2010), ‘Catalogue of Neotropical Plecoptera’, Iliesia, 6, 118–205.
  • Garrison, R.W., von Ellenrieder, N., and Louton, J.A. (2010), Damselfly Genera of the New World. An Illustrated and Annotated Key to the Zygoptera, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. xiv + 490.
  • Gimenez, B.C.G. (2017), ‘Land Use Effects on the Functional Structure of Aquatic Insect Communities in Neotropical Streams’, Inland Waters, 7, 305–313.
  • Heckman, C.W. (2002), Encyclopedia of South American Aquatic Insects: Ephemeroptera. Illustrated Keys to Known Families, Genera and Species in South America. Dordrecht, Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 419.
  • Heckman, C.W. (2008), Encyclopedia of South American Aquatic Insects: Odonata - Zygoptera. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. viii + 687.
  • Hogue, C.L., and Bedoya-Ortiz, I. (1989), ‘The Net-Winged Midge Fauna (Diptera: Blephariceridae) of Antioquia Department, Colombia,’ Contributions in Science. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
  • Kehoe, L., Romero-Munóz, A., Polania, E., Estes, L., Kreft, H., and Kummerle, T. (2017), ‘Biodiversity at Risk Under Future Cropland Expansion and Intensification’, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1, 1129–1135.
  • Liu, X.-Y., Hayashi, F., and Yang, D. (2015), ‘Phylogeny of the Family Sialidae (Insecta: Megaloptera) Inferred from Morphological Data, with Implications for Generic Classification and Historical Biogeography’, Cladistics, 31, 18–49.
  • Megna, Yo.S., and Epler, J.H. (2012), ‘A Review of Copelatus from Cuba, with the Description of Two New Species (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Copelatinae)’, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 52, 383–410.
  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005), Ecosystems and human Well-Being, Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  • Miller, K.B., and Montano, E.T. (2014) ‘Review of the Genus Fontidessus Miller & Spangler, 2008 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini) with Description of Four New Species’, ZooKeys, 426, 65–85.
  • Miller, K.B., and Spangler, P.J. (2008), ‘Fontidessus Miller and Spangler, A New Genus of Bidessini from Venezuela (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae) with Three New Species’, Zootaxa, 1827, 45–52.
  • Morrone, J.J. (2014), ‘Biogeographical Regionalisation of the Neotropical Region’, Zootaxa, 3782, 1–110.
  • Múrria, C., Rugenski, A.T., Whiles, M.R., and Vogler, A. (2015), ‘Long-term Isolation and Endemicity of Neotropical Aquatic Insects Limit the Community Responses to Recent Amphibian Decline’. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 938–949.
  • Parfin, S.I., and Gurney, A.B. (1956), ‘The Spongilla-Flies, with Special Reference to Those of the Western Hemisphere (Sisyridae, Neuroptera)’, Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 105, 421–529.
  • Parreira de Castro, D.M., Dolédc, S., and Castillo, M. (2018), ‘Land Cover Disturbance Homogenizes Aquatic Insect Functional Structure in Neotropical Savanna Streams’, Ecological Indicators, 84, 573–582.
  • Penny, N.D. (1981), ‘Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part 4. Sialidae’, Acta Amazonica, 11, 843–846.
  • Penny, N.D. (2002), ‘A Guide to the Lacewings (Neuroptera) of Costa Rica’, Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 53, 161–457.
  • Short A.E.Z., Cole, J., and Toussaint, E.F.A. (2017), ‘Phylogeny, Classification, and Evolution of the Water Scavenger Beetle Tribe Hydrobiusini inferred from Morphology and Molecules (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Hydrophilinae)’, Systematic Entomology, 42, 677–691.
  • Short, A.E.Z., and García, M. (2014), ‘A New Genus of Egg Case-Carrying Water Scavenger Beetle from the Guiana Shield (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Acidocerinae)’, Zootaxa, 3835, 251–262.
  • Short, A.E.Z., Joly, L.J., García, M., Wild, A., Bloom, D.D., and Maddison, D.R. (2015), ‘Molecular Phylogeny of the Hydroscaphidae (Coleoptera: Myxophaga) with Description of a Remarkable New Lineage from the Guiana Shield’, Systematic Entomology, 40, 214–229.
  • Sites, R.W., Willig, M.R., and Linit, M.J. (2003), ‘Macroecology of Aquatic Insects: A Quantitative Analysis of Taxonomic Richness and Composition in the Andes Mountains of Northern Ecuador’, Biotropica, 35, 226–239.
  • Stark, B.P., Froehlich, C., and Zúñiga, M.C. (2009). ‘South American Stoneflies (Plecoptera)’, in Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America (ABLA) (Vol. 5), eds. J. Adis, J.R. Arias, G. Rueda-Delgado, and K.M. Wantzen. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft, pp. 154.
  • Toledo, M. and Michat, M.C. (2015), ‘Description of Laccomimus gen. n. and Eleven New Species from the Neotropical Region (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Laccophilinae)’, Zootaxa, 3990, 301–354.
  • Toussaint, E.F.A., and Short, A.E.Z. (2016), ‘Molecular Phylogenetics of Atlantic Shield Platynectes Diving Beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae): A First Glance at the Evolution of the Genus in the Amazon Basin’ Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 52, 185–191.
  • Tundisi, J.G., and Masumura-Tundisi, T. (2008), ‘Biodiversity in the Neotropics: Ecological, Economic and Social Values’, Brazilian Journal of Biology, 68 (Supplement), 913–915.
  • Vidotto-Magnoni, A.P., and Carvalho, E.D. (2009), ‘Aquatic Insects as the Main Food Resource of Fish the Community in a Neotropical Reservoir’, Neotropical Ichthyology, 7, 701–708.
  • Williams, D.D., and Williams, S.S. (2017), ‘Aquatic Insects and Their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population’, Insects, 8, 4–20.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.