68
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Validation of Simplified Visual Acuity Testing Protocols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

, &
Pages 247-252 | Received 09 Feb 2017, Accepted 08 Mar 2017, Published online: 27 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA, LCVA) are potential quantitative markers of neurological dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The complex nature and duration of gold standard (GS) protocols precludes widespread use in neurology settings. This study compares simplified to GS visual acuity (VA) protocols. Monocular HCVA and LCVA were measured in ALS (n = 10) and control (n = 4) subjects using six protocols, varying by two chart and three refraction methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients between simplified and GS protocols ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 (HCVA, excellent agreement) and 0.56 to 0.75 (LCVA, moderate agreement). Differences between LCVA and GS protocols exceeded test-retest reliability. Simplified HCVA protocols using LCD (liquid crystal display) tablet charts and/or pinhole correction produced valid measurements. None of the modified LCVA testing protocols produced valid measurements.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants K12 EY 02147 and K23 EY 024345 and Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted awards to University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Stanford Department of Ophthalmology. King-Devick testing software was provided free of charge by the manufacturer. No funding agency was involved in the conceptualisation, design, implementation, or analysis of this study.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants K12 EY 02147 and K23 EY 024345 and Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted awards to University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Stanford Department of Ophthalmology. King-Devick testing software was provided free of charge by the manufacturer. No funding agency was involved in the conceptualisation, design, implementation, or analysis of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 455.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.