Article title: Why nutrition should be the first prescription
Authors: Quinlivan, J. & McGowan, L.
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
Bibliometrics: Volume 39, Number 4, pages 247
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2018.1557826
When the Editorial was first published, there are two instances in the text where the exact numbers of participants were not properly indicated. Please see below instances,
The Cochrane review findings mimic those of an early large randomised trial, DOMINO, which contributed 2XXX women to the final analysis and set the stage for global research to identify a nutritional solution to preterm birth [2]
Another large randomised trial of omega-3 LCFA supplementation in pregnancy (ORIP) involving XXX women is due to be published and will augment the Cochrane findings and refine the timing of supplements[3]
These should appear as:
The Cochrane review findings mimic those of an early large randomised trial, DOMINO, which contributed 2399 women to the final analysis and set the stage for global research to identify a nutritional solution to preterm birth [2]
Another large randomised trial of omega-3 LCFA supplementation in pregnancy (ORIP) involving 5540 women is due to be published and will augment the Cochrane findings and refine the timing of supplements[3]
Also, In paragraph 2, the cost of nutritional intervention should read “less than 25 cents a day” instead of “less than 10 cents a day”.
This has now been corrected in the online version.
Taylor & Francis apologizes for this error.