Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns: patient feedback survey-based report vis-à-vis objective clinical grading scales

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To report the outcomes of a survey on patients’ concerns and satisfaction with custom ocular prosthesis (COP) wear and compare with objective clinician grading scales.

Methods: The questionnaire was answered by 156 participants. General social concerns and prosthesis-related concerns were plotted on a scale of 0 to 10, indicating least to maximum satisfaction and also not concerned to very concerned. Comparison between subjective patient and objective clinician scores was done.

Results: The mean age at presentation was 27.53 ± 15.53 years (range 3–72 years).For patients that underwent a prior surgical procedure, mean satisfaction with the surgery was 9.42 ± 1.27. Mean satisfaction with the COP was 8.98 ± 1.75. The median satisfaction score for the primary surgery as well as for the outcome of the custom ocular prosthesis was 10. Commonest prosthesis-related concerns were reduced motility (mean 3 ± 2, median 3), watering, crusting and discharge (mean 2 ± 2, median 2), and difference in the size of the prosthetic eye relative to the other eye (mean 1 ± 2, median 1). Subjective patient concern responses and the objective clinician grading correlated strongly for movement of the prosthesis (r = –0.84, p < .0001), periocular fullness (r = 0.65, p < .0001), color of the prosthesis (r = –0.8, p < .0001) and size relative to the other eye (r = 0.7, p < .0001).

Conclusion: Custom ocular prosthesis usage had a high satisfaction score with minimal concerns. Commonest prosthesis-related concerns correlated strongly with objective clinician grading.

KEYWORDS:

• Anophthalmic socket
• implant
• patient concerns
• prosthesis
• survey

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation [1].