Abstract
Investigations of the impact of morphemic boundaries on transposed-letter (TL) priming effects have yielded conflicting results. Five masked priming lexical decision experiments were conducted to examine the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries with English suffixed derivations. Experiments 1–3 found that responses to monomorphemic target words (e.g., SPEAK) were facilitated to the same extent by morphologically related primes containing letter transpositions that did (SPEAEKR) or did not (SPEKAER) cross a morphemic boundary. This pattern was also observed in Experiments 4 and 5, in which the targets (e.g., SPEAKER) were the base forms of the TL primes. Thus, in these experiments the influence of the morphological structure of a TL prime did not depend on whether the letter transposition crossed a morphological boundary.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Institute for Child Health and Development grant P01 HD-001994 to Haskins Laboratories. Some of this research was conducted as part of the Anurag Rimzhim's Second Year Project at the University of Connecticut.
Notes
1BLUST is not a morpheme in English, and hence BLUSTER is not decomposable as BLUST + ER.
2These variables include bigram frequency (Frankish & Turner, Citation2007; Perea & Carreiras, Citation2008), letter frequency (Lupker et al., Citation2008), letter position (Gomez et al., Citation2008; Perea & Lupker, Citation2004), pronounceability (Frankish & Turner, Citation2007), syllable structure (Lee & Taft, Citation2009), and language (Velan & Frost, Citation2007,
Citation2009).
3This concern also applies to experiments employing monomorphemic words in which extant roots are concatenated with non-affix endings (e.g., BROTH/EL, QUART/Z). Baseline response times for conditions involving these words often differs from those for conditions involving seemingly well-matched morphologically complex words (cf. Feldman et al., Citation2009; McCormick et al., Citation2008; Rastle et al., Citation2004).
4We thank Jon Andoni Duñabeitia for this suggestion.
5Items used only in Experiment 3 and Experiment 4.
Frankish
,
C.
and
Turner
,
E.
2007
.
SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
56
:
189
–
211
.
Perea
,
M.
and
Carreiras
,
M.
2008
.
Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?
.
Language and Cognitive Processes
,
23
:
69
–
92
.
Lupker
,
S. J.
,
Perea
,
M.
and
Davis
,
C. J.
2008
.
Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency
.
Language and Cognitive Processes
,
23
(
1
)
:
93
–
116
.
Gomez
,
P.
,
Ratciff
,
R.
and
Perea
,
M.
2008
.
The overlap model: A model of letter position coding
.
Psychological Review
,
115
:
577
–
600
.
Perea
,
M.
and
Lupker
,
S. J.
2004
.
Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
51
:
231
–
246
.
Frankish
,
C.
and
Turner
,
E.
2007
.
SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
56
:
189
–
211
.
Lee
,
C. H.
and
Taft
,
M.
2009
.
Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
60
:
530
–
542
.
Velan
,
H.
and
Frost
,
R.
2007
.
Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew
.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
,
14
:
913
–
918
.
Velan
,
H.
and
Frost
,
R.
2009
.
Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
61
:
285
–
302
.
Feldman
,
L. B.
,
O'Connor
,
P. A.
and
Moscoso del Prado Martin
,
F.
2009
.
Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition
.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
,
16
:
684
–
691
.
McCormick
,
S.
,
Rastle
,
K.
and
Davis
,
M.
2008
.
Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition
.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
58
:
307
–
326
.
Rastle
,
K.
,
Davis
,
M.
and
New
,
B.
2004
.
The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition
.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
,
11
:
1090
–
1098
.