![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
The mission of cognitive neuroscience is to represent the interaction of cognitive science and neuroscience: cognitive models of the mind guide a neuroscientific investigation of the brain bases of mental processes. In this endeavour, a cognitive model is crucial as without it, the cognitive neuroscientist does not know what to look for in the brain, what the nature of the relevant representations might be, or how the different components of a process might interact with each other. In the cognitive neuroscience of language, the interaction of theoretical models and brain research has, however, been far from ideal, especially when it comes to the study of meaning at the sentence level. Although theoretical semantics has a long history in linguistics and thus offers detailed and comprehensive models of the nature of semantic representations, these theories have had minimal impact on the brain investigation of semantic processing. In this article, we outline what a theoretically grounded cognitive neuroscience of semantics might look like and summarise our own findings regarding the neural bases of semantic composition, the basic combinatory operation that builds the complex meanings of natural language.
Acknowledgements
The research discussed here was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0545186.
Notes
1Or in the scope of some other operator that supports decreasing inferences (Ladusaw, Citation1979, Citation1980, Citation1983).
2Although such a correlation can and must be obviously be built in, given the descriptive generalisation that syntactic and semantic operations do, by and large, stand in a one-to-one correspondence.
3For an extensive discussion on the possible empirical arguments for this, see Pylkkänen (Citation2008).