28
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A comparison of different experimental approaches in the determination of dynamic fracture toughness (J1d) behavior for RHA steel cost sustainable MMAW weldments

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 23 Jan 2024, Accepted 16 Mar 2024, Published online: 09 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

In the present investigation, the low hydrogen ferrite consumable weldment (weldment-1) and austenitic stainless steel consumable weldment (weldment-2) of rolled and homogenous armor steel (RHA) have been prepared with manual metal arc welding (MMAW). Further, the influence of weldments (weldment-1 and weldment-2) microstructure on the dynamic fracture toughness (J1d), strength, ductility and hardness has been evaluated and compared. The three different approaches have been utilized to estimate J1d for RHA weldments. Further, all three approaches’ outcomes have been compared with the elastic-plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) approach through Jp-R curve. The results revealed that weldment-1 (yield strength 504.24 MPa and ultimate tensile strength 763.03 MPa) exhibited 26.93 and 25.07% more yield and tensile strength respectively than weldment-2 (yield strength 384.55 MPa and ultimate tensile strength 593.05 MPa). Further, the elongation of weldment-2 (elongation 42%) is 26.72% more than weldment-1 (elongation 32.10%). The joint efficiency and fusion zone hardness of weldment-1 are 5.85 and 57.56%, respectively more than weldment-2. The EPFM approach has good agreement with the correction factor approach (approach 2) and the compliance change rate approach (approach 3) with less than 7% difference in the estimation of dynamic fracture toughness of base metal and weldments (weldment-1 and weldment-2). Further, the percentage difference between maximum load point approach (approach 1) and the EPFM approach is more than 15% difference. The fractographic investigation confirms the ductile fracture in all under-investigated materials.

Acknowledgment

No funding is available with this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author contributions

Ambuj Saxena: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation. Tarun Kumar Gupta: Data curation, writing – original draft. Rishi Srivastava: Software, data curation. Ashish Kumar Srivastava: Formal analysis, visualization, writing - review & editing. Ajay Kumar: Final editing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 432.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.