Abstract
This article presents a critical assessment of the use of interactive Digital Television (iDTV) to deliver electronic government and public services in the UK. It considers the organisational and institutional context for innovation in service delivery, explores iDTV policy and practice in the UK, and draws on recent empirical research around three of the UK's most significant iDTV initiatives. This emerging evidence base suggests that although the provision of public services via iDTV is still in its infancy, with current initiatives not yet sufficiently advanced to support widespread provision and use, it has the potential to become an increasingly important complementary service platform.
Notes
1. Cabinet Office. Modernising Government, Cm 4310; Cabinet Office: London, UK, 1999. Cabinet Office. UK online.gov.uk Connecting you with Government Information and Services; Cabinet Office: London, UK, 2001. National Audit Office (NAO). Government on the Web; NAO Report, HC87, 1999/2000, NAO: London, UK, 1999. National Audit Office (NAO). Government on the Web II; NAO Report, HC764, 2001/2002, NAO: London, UK, 2002. Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU). e-gov: Electronic Government Services for the 21st Century, PIU: Cabinet Office, London, UK, 2000.
4. Cabinet Office. Digital Television: A Policy Framework for Accessing E-Government Services; Office of the e-Envoy, Cabinet Office: London, UK, 2003. Green, T., Main, N. and Aitken-Smith. Can Interactive Digital Television Bridge the ‘Digital Divide’?; Napier University: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2004. Available at: http://www.dcs.napier.ac.uk/∼mm/socbytes/jun2001/Jun2001_12.htm. Accessed on 20 October 2005. Hansard Society. New Media and Social Exclusion. Hansard Society: London, UK, 2000.
6. Kim, P. Deconstructing Interactive TV Networks. The Public-Jounost 1999, 6 (3), 87–100. Kim, P. and Sawhney, H. A Machine-Like New Medium - Theoretical Examination of Interactive Television. Media, Culture and Society 2002, 24, 217–233.
7. Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 1996, XLIV, 936–957. Lowndes, V. Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal. Public Administration 1996, 74 (2), 181–197.
9. Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. 1996, op cit. Lowndes, V. 1996, op cit.
12. Fox, C.J. and Miller, H.Y. Postmodern Public Administration: Towards Discourse; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995. North, D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
14. Avgerou, C. 2000, op cit, 237.
15. Avgerou, C. 2000, op cit. Backhouse, J. and Silva, L. Becoming Part of the Furniture. In Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1997; 1–27.
16. Avgerou, C. 2000, op cit.
17. Empirical evidence relating to specific iDTV initiatives derives from research commissioned by Kirklees Metropolitan Council in 2002 and the Scottish Executive in 2005. Full details of the research can be found in: Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. Final Report on the INtouch kirklees Digital Television Project, Kirklees Metropolitan Council: Kirklees, UK, 2003a. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. Initial Report on the INtouch kirklees Digital Television Project, Kirklees Metropolitan Council: Kirklees, UK, 2003b. Smith, C. and Webster, C. Review of Interactive Digital Television Pilot, Scottish Executive Social Research: The Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.
18. Bekkers, V.J.J.M. and Zouridis, S. Electronic Service Delivery in Public Administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences 1999, 65 (2), 183–195. West, D. E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review 2004, 64 (1), 15–27.
23. Chadwick, A. and May, C. Interactions Between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain and the European Union. Governance 2003, 16 (2), 271–300. Edmiston, K.D. State and Local E-Government. American Review of Public Administration 2003, 33 (1), 20–45. Norris, D.F. Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare. Public Management Review 2005, 65 (1), 64–75. Tat-Kei Ho, A. 2002, op cit.
24. Edmiston, K.D. 2003, op cit.
25. Horrocks and Hambley, 1998; Norris, 2005) Horrocks, I. and Hambley, N. The ‘Webbing’ of British Local Government. Public Money and Management 1998, 18 (2), 39–44. Norris, D.F. 2003, op cit.
26. Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. 1998, op cit.
27. Taylor, J.A. and Webster, C.W.R. Universalism, Public Services and Citizenship in the Information Age. Information Infrastructure and Policy 1996, 5 (3), 217–233. West, D. 2004, op cit.
30. Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. 1998, op cit.
31. Tat-Kei Ho, A. 2002, op cit.
34. Carey, J. 1997, op cit. Kim, P. and Sawhney, H. 2002, op cit.
38. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2002, op cit.
39. Kim, P. and Sawhney, H. 2002, op cit.
40. Information TV. Information TV and the Local Government Channel; 26 September 2005. Available at URL: http://www.information.tv/News/?id+19. Accessed on 20 October 2005. Local Government TV Channel URL: www.thelocalgovernmentchannel.com.
41. Cabinet Office. 1999, op cit.
42. Performance and Innovation Unit. 2000, op cit.
43. Central Information Technology Unit. 2000, op cit.
44. Cabinet Office. 2003, op cit.
45. Ibid, 3.
46. Central Information Technology Unit. 2000, op cit.
47. Ibid, 41.
49. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2002, op cit. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003c, op cit.
51. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003a, op cit. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit.
55. Ibid, 13.
56. Ibid, 20.
58. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2005, op cit.
60. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003c, op cit.
61. Avgerou, C. 2000, op cit, 235.
62. Cabinet Office. 2002, op cit.
64. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit.
65. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2005, op cit. Gilliatt, J. and Brogden, J. 21st Century Government: Interactive Digital Television (iDTV) Pilot, Lambda Research and Consultancy: The Scottish Executive; Edinburgh, UK, 2004.
68. Suffolk County Council. Attitudes to Digital Interactive Services – Qualitative Research: Key Findings, MORI: Suffolk County Council, Ipswich Borough Council and Babergh District Council, 2002. West Lothian Council. Interactive Digital TV Pilot Project: Feedback from Focus Group Consultation, Cunningham, L.: West Lothian Council, 2001.
69. RBA Research. 2004, op cit.
70. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit, 27.
71. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2005, op cit, 33.
72. DigiTV. 2005, op cit, 3.
73. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2005, op cit. Suffolk County Council. 2001, op cit.
74. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit, 28–30.
75. RBA Research. 2004, op cit.
76. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003a, op cit.
77. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003a, op cit. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit.
78. Smith, C.F. and Webster, C.W.R. 2003b, op cit, 19.
79. Ibid, 23.
80. Ibid, 6.
81. RBA Research. 2004, op cit.
82. MacKenzie, D. 1996, op cit.