806
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil

&
Pages 839-848 | Received 17 Jan 2007, Accepted 15 Apr 2007, Published online: 06 May 2008
 

ABSTRACT

Iron (Fe) availability is low in calcareous soils of southern Iran. The chelate Fe-ethylenediamine di (o-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid) (Fe-EDDHA), has been used as an effective source of Fe in correcting Fe deficiency in such soils. In some cases, however, its application might cause nutritional disorder due to the antagonistic effect of Fe with other cationic micronutrients, in particular with manganese (Mn). A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of soil and foliar applications of Fe and soil application of manganese (Mn) on dry matter yield (DMY) and the uptake of cationic micronutrients in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. Ghods) in a calcareous soil. Results showed that neither soil application of Fe-EDDHA nor foliar application of Fe sulfate had a significant effect on wheat DMY. In general, Fe application increased Fe uptake but decreased that of Mn, zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu). Application of Mn increased only Mn uptake and had no significant effect on the uptake of the other cationic micronutrients. Iron treatments considerably increased the ratio of Fe to Mn, Zn, Cu, and (Mn + Zn + Cu). Failure to observe an increase in wheat DMY following Fe application is attributed to the antagonistic effect of Fe with Mn, Zn, and Cu and hence, imbalance in Fe to (Mn + Zn + Cu) ratio. Due to the nutritional disorder and imbalance, it appears that neither soil application of Fe-EDDHA nor foliar application of Fe-sulfate is appropriate in correcting Fe deficiency in wheat grown on calcareous soils. Hence, growing Fe-efficient wheat cultivars should be considered as an appropriate practice for Fe chlorosis-prone calcareous soils of southern Iran.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to appreciate Shiraz University for providing research facilities. We thank Mr. Nouri for his help in soil sampling and collection.

Notes

aMeans in each row or column followed by the same lower case or capital letters are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.

b,

cSoil application (mg Fe kg−1 as Fe-EDDHA) and foliar spray [FeSO4.7H2O (%)], respectively.

aMeans in each row or column followed by the same lower case or capital letters are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.

b,

cSoil application (mg Fe kg−1 as Fe-EDDHA) and foliar spray [FeSO4.7H2O (%)], respectively.

aMeans in each row or column followed by the same lower case or capital letters are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.

b,

cSoil application (mg Fe kg−1 as Fe-EDDHA) and foliar spray [FeSO4.7H2O (%)], respectively.

aMeans in each row or column followed by the same lower case or capital letters are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.

b,

cSoil application (mg Fe kg−1 as Fe-EDDHA) and foliar spray [FeSO4.7H2O (%)], respectively.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 495.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.