The response of a high-yielding canola hybrid to sulfur fertilization in three contrasting Saskatchewan soils

Abstract

Canola (Brassica napus) is the primary oilseed crop in western Canada; however, it is often grown on sulfur (S)-deficient soils. Moreover, canola has a high S demand compared to cereals and, therefore, is particularly sensitive to S deficiency. This study examined the growth and nutrient uptake responses of a high-yielding canola hybrid cultivar to S fertilization when grown on three contrasting soils differing in S fertility, with and without the addition of fertilizer S. The soils were collected from three soil-climatic zones within Saskatchewan (Brown, Black, and Gray) and three different fertilizer S forms were used: ammonium sulfate (AS); ammonium thiosulfate (ATS); and a composite fertilizer containing nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and S (NPS; 50-50 blend of sulfate (SO₄) salt and elemental S). Sulfur fertilization increased the canola biomass, along with plant uptake of N, P, and S on all three soils. Fertilizer S use efficiency (i.e. recovery) ranged from 11-75%. For all three soils, the general trend among fertilizer S forms for biomass, nutrient uptake, and fertilizer use efficiency was AS > ATS > NPS. The greatest differences were observed with the Gray soil, which had the poorest S fertility. Residual soil SO₄ after harvest was greater for ATS and NPS; reflecting continued oxidation of thiosulfate and elemental S to SO₄. Principal component analysis demonstrated the importance of tissue N:S ratio as a key diagnostic measurement related to canola growth and nutrient uptake in S-deficient soils.

Keywords:

• Brassica napus
• fertilizer use efficiency
• nitrogen
• nutrient uptake
• N:S
• N:P
• phosphorus
• principal component analysis
• S:P

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Canola Council of Canada for funding this research; C. Stevenson for assisting with the statistical analyses; A. Adams and T. King for their logistical support; and the anonymous Reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.