Growth and yield responses of rainfed lowland rice to different nitrogen fertilizer sources, methods and time of applications in Fogera Plain, northwest Ethiopia

Abstract

Two sets of field experiments under seedling transplanting and drill row seed planting methods were conducted side by side for two years during the main cropping seasons of 2017 and 2018 in Fogera Plain of northwest Ethiopia to study the effect of different sources, application methods and time of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of rain-fed lowland rice. Three N sources of fertilizers (conventional Urea, Urea super-granule, and slow-release Urea) with six, one, and three application methods and times, respectively were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replicates. These treatments and design were equally applied for two sets of experiments under both planting methods. Results revealed that soil-plant analysis development (SPAD) value, LAI, and biomass and grain yields of rain-fed lowland rice were highest with Urea supergranule N fertilizer sources followed by slow-release Urea and conventional Urea applications in both planting methods. Average grain yields of 3.7 and 3.8 tons ha⁻¹ of rain-fed lowland rice were recorded with the application of Urea supergranule N source fertilizer under seedling transplanting and drill row seed planting methods, respectively. Hence, using Urea supergranule tablet is recommendable for getting better grain yield of rain-fed lowland rice without yield penalty in both planting methods.

Keywords:

• lowland rice
• N fertilizer sources
• soil-plant analysis development (SPAD) value
• urea supergranule

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) for providing financial support to carry out the study of this work. The authors also would like to thank Sirinka Agricultural Research Center (SARC) and Fogera National Rice Research and Training Center (FNRRTC) for providing necessary facilities for this study.

Disclosure statement

No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.