126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Evaluation of organic acidifiers as a corrective measure for high bicarbonate concentrations in organic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) float bed systems

, , , , &
Pages 523-535 | Received 29 Apr 2020, Accepted 03 Aug 2020, Published online: 18 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Interest in the production of USDA-certified organic tobacco continues to increase. Limited research exists that focuses on organic production practices specific to tobacco. Float beds, a semi-hydroponic system, are commonly used to germinate seed and produce healthy transplants. High bicarbonate concentrations in the float bed solution are a common issue and can greatly affect seedling health. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate OMRI-certified acidifier treatments for their effects on float bed media and solution nutrient status and plant health. Treatments included acetic acid, liquid citric acid, granular citric acid, a sulfuric acid conventional check, and stagnant and aerated controls. Miniature float beds were constructed to which the acidifier treatments were applied, each containing a single 288-cell tray and fertilized with seabird guano. The aerator treatment was the only one to consistently maintain bicarbonate levels below the recommended 100 mg L−1. Aeration also created an environment that favored high nitrate and low ammonium concentrations compared to all other treatments. Dissolved oxygen remained at or above 6 mg L−1 with aeration, while the remaining five treatments resulted in concentrations below 4 mg L−1. No significant differences were found among the acidifier treatments for percent of usable transplants produced. Media selection may play a role in buffering the extreme bicarbonate concentrations, as the pH in the media tended to be lower than the more alkaline solution. The use of an aerator proved to be an effective means to manage high bicarbonate and appears to promote higher rates of nitrification of the organic fertilizer source material.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 495.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.