Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findings: Municipalities across the United States are gradually recognizing urban agriculture as an integral part of planning, land use, and zoning ordinances. We review the literature on the regulation of urban agriculture at a moment when policy and regulatory vacuums exist and the acceptance and integration of urban agriculture is uneven. We review the current regulatory practices of 40 metropolitan and 40 micropolitan municipalities in the 4 U.S. Census regions. We find that municipalities are filling policy vacuums by adopting enabling ordinances (zoning ordinances, land use designations, resolutions), regulations on urban agriculture production (backyard animals, built structures, practitioner responsibility), and fiscal policy instruments (restrictions on sales of agricultural products, tax abatement, urban agriculture fees). Our findings support local planning practitioners in filling regulatory gaps, practitioners of urban agriculture in seeking how it’s done elsewhere, and researchers in discerning new applied and basic research projects. We identify 3 principal knowledge gaps: Planners need a complete typology of regulatory possibilities; a better understanding of how local, state, and federal legislations constrain or enable urban agriculture; and empirical evidence of the economic, social, and environmental impacts of urban agriculture.
Takeaway for practice: Planners should assess existing urban agricultural practices and consider which regulatory frameworks best support multiple local goals, incorporating a concern with urban agriculture into ongoing activities, deploying existing or innovative land use tools, facilitating institutional cooperation, and promoting inclusive decision making and community engagement.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. We also thank Jason Hachadorian and Kyle Hearing for providing additional research assistance and Amy Laura Cahn, J.D., for her valuable feedback on an earlier draft.
Notes
1. Phone interview with S. Danko-Day, open space specialist, Department of City Planning, City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on November 10, 2015, by L. Bonarek.
2. Phone interview with J. Peterson, planner, Development Management Division, City Planning and Development, Kansas City, Missouri, on November 25, 2015, by L. Bonarek.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Mahbubur Meenar
Mahbubur Meenar ([email protected]) is an assistant professor of geography, planning, and sustainability at Rowan University in New Jersey.
Alfonso Morales
Alfonso Morales ([email protected]) is a professor of planning and landscape architecture at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Leonard Bonarek
Leonard Bonarek ([email protected]) is a regional planner for the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia (PA).