587
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Ethnic Categorization: The Role of Epistemic Motivation, Prejudice, and Perceived Threat

, &
Pages 66-75 | Received 29 Oct 2009, Accepted 02 Jun 2011, Published online: 03 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

In this study we first examine how host nationals (i.e., Italians) categorize immigrants; second, we look into the roles played by estimation of size and composition of immigrant population, perceived threat, prejudice, and need for cognitive closure in that process. In the first part of the study, participants responded to questionnaires measuring the variables just mentioned, including an estimation of which immigrant group was the largest in Italy. In the second part of the study, 96 photographs of male faces from 16 immigrant groups were shown to participants (N = 195). They were asked to identify the country of origin of each person in the photographs. Results showed that perceived threat enhanced the effect of prejudice and need for cognitive closure in the process of ethnic categorization. Individuals with a high need for cognitive closure and prejudice toward ethnic groups classified more immigrants as members of the group estimated as being the largest in their country when they perceived immigrants as a threat. The implications of outgroup overclassification for prejudice against immigrants are discussed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant obtained from the National Council of Research in Italy 2002-2003. We thank the Editor Leonard Newman and anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

Notes

Note. The alpha values are presented in parentheses in diagonal. N = 195.

*p < .05. **p < .01.

Note. NCC = need for cognitive closure.

Note. (1) and (2) = high prejudice, high NCC versus high prejudice, low NCC; (1) and (3) = high prejudice, high NCC versus low prejudice, high NCC; (1) and (4) = high prejudice, high NCC versus low prejudice, low NCC; (2) and (3) = high prejudice, low NCC versus low prejudice, high NCC; (3) and (4) = low prejudice, high NCC versus low prejudice, low NCC.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 320.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.