785
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Silent or Talking in the Classroom: Implicit Self-Stereotyping Among Asian and White Students

&
Pages 386-396 | Published online: 25 Sep 2014
 

Abstract

In academic settings, Asian students are often described as less talkative than White students. We provide an account of this phenomenon based on research on cultural influences on the self, self-categorization, and implicit social cognition. We hypothesized that the classroom context activates a process of implicit self-stereotyping. Asian and White participants were asked to imagine themselves in a classroom or leisure context. Next, they completed Implicit Association Tests assessing their self-concept, ethnic stereotypes, and ethnic identification. In the classroom context only, ethnic stereotypes accounted for a more reserved self-concept among Asian participants and a more talkative self-concept among White participants.

Notes

1After the self-concept IAT, participants described themselves on the traits used for the self-concept IAT. Responses on this measure were not affected by the context manipulation and were not reliably correlated with the self-concept IAT. Before the demographic questions, Asian participants completed the Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation scale (Suinn, Ahuna, & Khoo, Citation1992). Responses on this scale did not account for or moderate findings reported in this article. Results based on these measures are not presented in this article for brevity's sake.

Note. For Coding of Mental Imagery and Self-Concept, higher scores reflect more reserved (less talkative) self-images. For Ethnic Stereotypes, higher scores reflect stronger ethnic stereotypes (Asians are more reserved than Whites). For Ethnic Identification, positive scores reflect identification with Asians, whereas negative scores reflect identification with Whites. For Perceived Ethnic Composition, scores express the proportion of members of own ethnic group in the imagined situation.

2Responses from 15 participants were excluded from this analysis because they did not provide numbers or proportions, but instead responded with answers such as “a lot,” “a few,” or “many.”

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 320.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.