Abstract
This article critically examines the recently introduced and hotly debated conceptual approach of planning cultures. While most scientific papers and studies try to focus on the advantages and forces of planning culture as an analytical approach, this article concentrates more generally on the scientific discourse on planning cultures, i.e. with which intentions the concept has evolved, how it differs from other planning theories, and if the concept has achieved the expected results. By analyzing the original idea of the concept and addressing the complex relationships between culture – including the specific socioeconomic patterns and related cultural norms, values, traditions, and attitudes – and spatial planning as an operative instrument of territorial policy, both the potentials and shortcomings of planning culture are presented and discussed. It is evident that planning culture as a concept allows us to place specific developments, planning routines and principles in direct correlation with each other, offering a new and culturally influenced perspective on the analysis of planning practices. At the same time, it also becomes apparent that the concept is still unclear and faces challenges with regard to its adaptation for empirical research. The main reasons for this might be found in the omnipresence of culture, the static focus of planning culture research, and methodological issues preventing the application of the various models for practical research. The article then concludes in how far the analysis of planning cultures is able to contribute to a contemporary understanding of planning practices and routines, and how research on planning cultures can be improved.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Meike Levin-Keitel
Dr. Meike Levin-Keitel ist an der Leibniz Universität Hannover als wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Umweltplanung tätig. Ihre bisherigen thematischen Schwerpunkte liegen in der Europäischen Raumentwicklung, Wasser in der räumlichen Planung urbaner Flusslandschaften sowie analytischen Forschungsansätzen wie Planungskultur und anderen theoretischen Planungsverständnissen.
Frank Othengrafen
Junior-Prof. Dr. Frank Othengrafen, Juniorprofessor für Landesplanung und Raumforschung, insbesondere Regional Governance am Institut für Umweltplanung der Leibniz Universität Hannover; Arbeitsschwerpunkte: vergleichende Planungssystemund PlanungskulturForschung, Planungstheorie und methodik, Europäische Raumentwicklung, Neue GovernanceFormen und die demokratische Legitimation von Stadtund Regionalplanung.