Abstract
This article critiques the increasing claims in scholarly and diplomatic circles of a putative South African hegemony in Africa. On the backdrop of the recalibration of Nigeria's GDP making it Africa's largest economy, there have been counter arguments that South Africa's regional influence is dwindling as a result of its staggering economy among other domestic impediments. In this paper, I take the position that although South Africa's capacity to fulfil a hegemonic role may be hindered by internal and external ambivalences, these factors do not in any way disqualify the country from playing a hegemonic role. I conclude by making the assertion that our regional understanding of hegemony in the African context must be one that operates beyond the realm of the preponderant material capabilities of a state into reasonable measures of ideational characteristics.
Notes
1. According to Geldenhuys, non-material resources may include exemplary political and social values, cultural attraction, the quality of domestic political leadership, and a sound diplomatic reputation.
2. Formally known as the Strategic Defence Acquisition, the ‘Arms Deal' is the notorious nickname for South African government's multi-billion-rand military acquisition project finalized in 1999 under the Mbeki administration.
3. A derogatory term generally used to specifically refer to black foreigners in South Africa.
4. According to its website, ‘The Elders’ is an independent group of global leaders established in 2007 by Nelson Mandela with the goal of promoting global peace and human rights.