This paper reports the results of a ten year search for consensus among scientific findings on the nature of the origin and development of moral sensitivity and morality. Fields surveyed include psychology, sociology, political science, economics, history, and gender and feminist studies in social science; physics and biology in natural science; and brain research, old and new evolutionary studies and theory, including chaos, self‐organizing, and other nonlinear theories in systems science. An agreement on six underlying factors was found. Based on these “foundations,” a new theory of moral transformation and a new global ethic are proposed.
Scientific foundations for a global ethic at a time of evolutionary crisis
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.