Harnessing ‘the Force of All Creation’:¹ Part Two. Psi-Formation—Psychoenergetic and Quantum Holographic Processes

Abstract

In Part One (Bradley, 2024b), Love’s ubiquitous power was documented—both for human biopsychosocial function, and for accessing higher consciousness and psychic proficiencies. Here, in Part Two, a quantum holographic account elucidates love’s vital role in psychic interactions—viz, intuition and intention. Psi-formation—psychically induced change—is the power of mind through spirit to shape reality. The concepts of multiscale entanglement and oscillatory entrainment are developed to explain how instant nonlocal communication occurs and how focused intention—psi-formation—can change reality. Reformulation of Tiller’s ‘reaction equation’ highlights Love’s role in the relations of creation among Consciousness, Love, Energy, Information, and Matter.

Keywords:

• consciousness
• love
• psi research
• quantum holography
• William Tiller

Acknowledgements

I owe my dear friend, colleague, and mentor—the late Karl Pribram, an enormous intellectual debt for his pioneering research and holographic approach to perception and memory. I am grateful to Ervin Laszlo for his support and encouragement, over the decades we have been acquainted, and especially in the last few years during my work on this topic. My good friend and colleague, Murray Gillin deserves a special note of gratitude, both for his bold new book (Gillin, 2021) which was instructive in deciphering aspects of Tiller’s terminology, and for his review, as a former physicist, of my equations. Murray, along with Rob Nixon, Robert Rees, and my wife, Chaarenne Torris, also provided helpful comments on previous versions of the manuscript. Chaarenne has been unwavering in her support, love, and patience in reading and rereading numerous previous versions in our joint effort to improve the clarity of this work. Finally, and I thank my friend Bruce MacLennan for permission to use his sinusoidal model of the logon in Figure 2, and my brother, Barry Bradley—a world class cartographer, for rendering the images in Figure 1, and redrawing the images in Figures 3 and 6.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1 ‘[T]he Force of All Creation,’ is William Tiller’s evocative phrase (see Tiller et al., 2005: 230).

2 These are Kuhn’s own words, which I have inserted to clarify his meaning in this quote.

3 E.g., Bradley (1987, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2020, 2023a, 2023b, 2024a); Bradley and Pribram (1998); Pribram & Bradley (1998); Bradley and Tomasino (2011).

4 Gabor’s reasons for using a Gaussian envelope to modulate the elementary signal are given in his paper, “Communication Theory and Physics.” “One can represent an arbitrary signal in an infinity of ways as a linear function of certain “elementary” signals, associated with the individual cells. There is however one description of particular interest, in which the elementary signals are harmonic functions, modulated with a “Gaussian” signal. (sic) i.e. they have envelopes of probability shape. (Figure 2) These share with other functions the property that their Fourier transforms have the same shape, but they are unique in the respect that the product of their “effective” duration and of their effective frequency width is the smallest possible for any function” (Gabor, 1953: 49–50; italics added).

5 While beyond our scope here, the processing of energy and information within our bodies, whether from internal or external sources, involves structured water at the molecular level. According to Nuday (2014), there are one million, trillion, trillion molecules of water in the human body, of which 99.9% are ‘structured’ water. Organized as a ‘liquid crystal,’ structured water has “incalculable” capacity for “encoding” energy and information “via its molecular arrangements of complex fractal patterns within its bond arrangements”, which, in turn, enables “our physical systems [to operate] as a dynamic, water-based, fractal antenna” for receiving and transmitting nonlocal information. Moreover, “the structure of our bio-water determines the conductivity and the electromagnetic field interactions of our cells and DNA, it is vitally important in virtually every process in the body, and [its] de-structuring … is intimately related to aging, disease, and death.” (Nuday, 2014: 102–103 and 231, respectively; original italics, underlining added).

6 Quotes from SantaMaria et al. (1995): 158; italics added.

7 See the studies of Buddhist meditators described in McCraty et al. (2006): 45–47.

8 This is Bohm and Hilely’s (1993) concept of “active information.”

9 Tiller et al. (2005): 199; italics added. While Tiller uses the study’s results to illustrate various “types” of ‘information entanglement’ (ranging from local and nonlocal instrument entanglement to human-instrument and human-human entanglement), he provides no definition of this notion, which is a central concept in his scheme (see pages 196–210). Further, “information entanglement” is not listed in the book’s “Glossary” or “Index.”

10 As previously quoted above: “A postulated substance, called deltrons from the domain of emotion (outside physical reality), exists and has the quality of being able to travel at velocities both above and below c and to interact with substances from both levels of physical reality [viz, that of D-space—conventional spacetime, and R-space—the quantum vacuum).” This appears a contradiction, i.e., using both “postulated” and “exists” to describe the existential status of “deltrons.” Tiller et al. (2005): 137; italics added.

11 However, insofar as deltrons are further postulated to operate as the means of transmission between the two spaces, and communicate the intention as an encoded signal, then deltrons must be equivalent to Gabor’s logons. This is essential if deltrons are to transmit the structural features of the intention as a prescription template to change the object.

12 It is this property of quantum holography that is the basis of its application in modern imaging/scanning technologies (such as, fMRI, CT, and CAT scans, plus spectral, sonographic, and acoustical scanning technologies) in which the macroscale features of objects, at the molecular level and above, are encoded as coherent—nonrandom—patterns at the quantum level and, thus, can be retrieved and decoded from emissions using energetic prompts/probes in such fields as medical science, engineering, geology, and astrophysics.

13 See Bradley (1998 & 2004) for the genesis of the holographic approach employed in what follows—viz, combining the principles of Classical and Quantum Holography to describe goal-directed or intentional action. The idea occurred to me when writing about Laszlo’s (1995) theory of quantum vacuum interaction (Bradley, 1998, 2000). I realized that combining these two forms of holography into a feed-forward—feedback system provided a solution to the determinism of David Bohm’s (1980) implicate order. This approach was elaborated in Bradley (2004) and is the basis of its development in this work.

14 See Bradley (1987, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2023a, 2023b, 2024a, 2024b), Bradley and Pribram (1998), and Bradley and Tomasino (2011).

15 There is evidence that “entanglement” extends to the macro scale level. Recently, physicists at Muenchen University (Germany) have reported successfully entangling two atoms each separated in laboratories 400 meters apart—using the “entanglement swapping” protocol (see https://xqp.physik.uni-muenchen.de/research/atom_photon/entangling_atoms/index.html).

16 Quoted in Gillin (2021: 272 & 273; italics added.

17 While previously highly contested (for instance, Einstein famously referred to evidence of nonlocality as “spooky action at a distance”), quantum entanglement was recently acknowledged as a scientific fact with the awarding of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics to Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger for their courageous experiments that established the reality of nonlocality.

18 See the studies reviewed in Hameroff and Penrose (2013). See also, Marcer (1995) and Marcer and Schempp (1998).

19 There is evidence that the bonds of love are the basis of all life, and that the bonds of attachment form the access channel to psychic communications among social animals, and between humans and their pets—such as premonition and telepathy (Sheldrake, 1999; Bradley, 2012).

20 This is the proposition in Jahn and Dunne’s basic equation (see Equation 1(1) $$\begin{array}{c}\text{A. Forward FT}:F\left(k\right)=F_x\left[ƒ\left(x\right)\right]\left(k\right)={\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }ƒ\left(x\right)e^{-\mathbf{2}\pi \mathit{\text{ikx}}}\mathit{\text{dx}}\\ \text{B. Inverse FT}:f\left(x\right)=F_k{}^{-1}\left[F\left(k\right)\right]\left(x\right)={\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }F\left(k\right)e^{\mathbf{2}\pi \mathit{\text{ikx}}}\mathit{\text{dx}}\end{array}$$(1) , in Part One), and is in accord with Tiller and associate’s conclusions from their research.

21 Marcer (1995). The quote is from Mitchell (2000): 302; italics added.

22 Thuraisingham’s words, quoted in Gillin (2021: 272).

23 See https://xqp.physik.uni-muenchen.de/research/atom_photon/entangling_atoms/index.html).

24 Thuraisingham, quoted in Gillin (2021: 272 & 273).

25 This section draws heavily on Bradley (2007).

26 Bancel & Nelson (2008), Bradley (2020), McCraty et al. (2004b), Nelson (2008), Radin (1997).

27 The reader may recall that the word “magic” is in the title of Tiller et al’s. book (Tiller et al., 2005).

28 See Katz’s (1984) excellent, highly informative study, Boiling Energy.

29 Gillin (2021). Before changing his career and becoming leading pioneer in entrepreneurship research, my good friend and colleague, Murray Gillin, was a recognized former materials science physicist—as William Tiller was.

30 Gillin (2021): 356 & 360–361; the addition in square brackets are Gillin’s own words, see page 366.

31 It should be noted, there are two further subprocesses (not shown in the final set of expressions in the equation) which empower the agent to process the quantum holographic feedback information on the object’s disposition (TO^Δ/t(QHϕ^→A)) and to modify the intention, accordingly. One involves translation of quantum holographic spectra encoding changes in the object, via an inverse FT(f(x)), into perceptual imagery in spacetime. The second involves adjustment of the intention, if/as required (A^Iψ^AIΔĨ).