ABSTRACT
As research has shown, former elite athletes often struggle to adapt to aspects of their post-sport lives. This can include the management of their identities, dealing with the uncertainty of their new roles, and negotiating the changes that occur to their bodies. In this paper we discuss an under-reported challenge facing retired athletes: how to manage their ongoing relationship with exercise. To address this issue we adopted a narrative approach, based on the first author’s experiences as a former football player, to provide a socio-cultural reading of the various challenges involved in the transition from exercise as a vocation to a leisure activity. We suggest that these stories demonstrate that in retirement, former athletes’ docility, while seemingly advantageous, can also be a significant obstacle to developing alternative meanings for exercise, including as a potential re-creative or leisure activity that can become meaningful and important in its own right.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Luke Jones
Luke Jones is a Lecturer in Sports Coaching at the University of Hull, UK. His research focuses upon the analysis of sports coaching practices as they pertain to former athletes' sports retirement experiences through the adoption of a Foucauldian framework.
Jim Denison
Jim Denison is a Professor in the Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. He studies coaching from a socio-cultural perspective. More specifically, through the work of Foucault he views coaching as a social act whereby what coaches know and do on a daily basis is as much a relational process as it is a scientific one.