Publication Cover
Social Work Education
The International Journal
Volume 30, 2011 - Issue 3
2,353
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring Professional Stereotypes and Learning for Inter-professional Practice: An Example from UK Qualifying Level Social Work Education

&
Pages 266-280 | Published online: 25 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of stereotyping from UK social work students' and educators' perspectives. It discusses findings from an exploration of inter-professional practice with two cohorts of final year social work students in a UK university. The authors adapted a questionnaire to initiate discussion about inter-professional working with BA and MA students participating in a specialist child and family social work module. This paper analyses students' responses to the questionnaire and explores wider issues relating to professional stereotyping and identity, discussing the usefulness of these concepts for social work education and collaborative practice. Results suggest that student social workers held both positive and negative assumptions about specific occupations/professions (such as medicine), and that these acted as a mirror or tool for reflecting back their own views of social work identity/ies. We argue that this pedagogic exercise in identifying stereotypical assumptions about ‘others’ may encourage the building of a positive sense of ‘own’ professional identity. We further suggest that students should be encouraged to construct a core social work identity that is dynamic and responsive to changing contexts.

Notes

[1] A review of progress since the Laming Report (Citation2003).

[2] Stereotype: ‘(fig) make unchangeable, impart monotonous regularity to, fix in all details, formalize’ (Concise Oxford Dictionary).

[3] This concept of tribalism has also been examined in relation to professional identity in higher education (Becher and Trowler, Citation2001).

[4] Based on the Likert scale ratings.

[5] The results were recoded into two groups MA (n = 26) and BA+Mixed (n = 15) for chi square tests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 529.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.