1,037
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Designing teaching and reflection experiences to develop candidates’ science teaching self-efficacy

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 211-231 | Published online: 05 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Teacher self-efficacy beliefs are known to be a predictor of future teaching practices and are related to teacher effectiveness and student learning. Science teaching self-efficacy beliefs are especially important in elementary school teacher preparation where candidates are traditionally less confident and interested in science. However, there is a lack of understanding as how to best structure science methods courses to allow candidates to become self-efficacious teachers of science.

Purpose

This study draws attention to a science methods course structure and the experiences within the course that developed candidates’ self-efficacy beliefs related to science teaching and learning.

Sample

Participants were 50 teacher candidates enrolled in a Masters of Art in Childhood Education degree at a large, private university in the Northeast United States.

Design and methods

A mixed-method triangulation design was employed to best capture the development of candidates’ self-efficacy related to science teaching and learning. Data sources included the Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument-B, weekly self-ratings on confidence as a learner and teacher as a science, and weekly reflective journal entries.

Results

There was a significant increase in Personal Science Teaching Efficacy, Science Teaching Outcome Expectancy, and self-rating of confidence as teacher of science and as a learner of science. Qualitative data analysis identified similar transformations in candidates’ science teaching self-efficacy.

Conclusion

These findings provides evidence-based guidance for designing science methods courses that address Bandura’s (Citation1977) four sources of self-efficacy (emotional arousal, social persuasion, vicarious experience, and mastery experience) to allow for the development of candidates’ science teaching self-efficacy and further elucidates the dynamic nature of self-efficacy development. Specific recommendations for the design of science methods courses are provided.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by authors

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

ISS Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,007.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.