1,258
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Relationship between maximal oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake attained during treadmill middle-distance running

, , &
Pages 851-858 | Accepted 20 Jun 2006, Published online: 01 May 2007
 

Abstract

Traditionally, it has been assumed that during middle-distance running oxygen uptake ([Vdot]O2) reaches its maximal value ([Vdot]O2max) providing the event is of a sufficient duration; however, this assumption is largely based on observations in individuals with a relatively low [Vdot]O2max. The aim of this study was to determine whether [Vdot]O2max is related to the [Vdot]O2 attained (i.e. [Vdot]O2peak) during middle-distance running on a treadmill. Fifteen well-trained male runners (age 23.3 ± 3.8 years, height 1.80 ± 0.10 m, body mass 76.9 ± 10.6 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. The participants undertook two 800-m trials to examine the reproducibility of the [Vdot]O2 response. These two trials, together with a progressive test to determine [Vdot]O2max, were completed in a randomized order. Oxygen uptake was determined throughout each test using 15-s Douglas bag collections. Following the application of a 30-s rolling average, the highest [Vdot]O2 during the progressive test (i.e. [Vdot]O2max) was compared with the highest [Vdot]O2 during the 800-m trials (i.e. [Vdot]O2peak) to examine the relationship between [Vdot]O2max and the [Vdot]O2 attained in the 800-m trials. For the 15 runners, [Vdot]O2max was 58.9 ± 7.1 ml · kg−1 · min−1. Two groups were formed using a median split based on [Vdot]O2max. For the high and low [Vdot]O2max groups, [Vdot]O2max was 65.7 ± 3.0 and 52.4 ± 1.8 ml · kg−1 · min−1 respectively. The limits of agreement (95%) for test – retest reproducibility for the [Vdot]O2 attained during the 800-m trials were ± 3.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1 for a [Vdot]O2peak of 50.6 ml · kg−1 · min−1 (the mean [Vdot]O2peak for the low [Vdot]O2max group) and ± 2.3 ml · kg−1 · min−1 for a [Vdot]O2peak of 59.0 ml · kg−1 · min−1 (the mean [Vdot]O2peak for the high [Vdot]O2max group), with a bias in [Vdot]O2peak between the 800-m runs (i.e. the mean difference) of 1.2 ml · kg−1 · min−1. The [Vdot]O2peak for the 800-m runs was 54.8 ± 4.9 ml · kg−1 · min−1 for all 15 runners. For the high and low [Vdot]O2max groups, [Vdot]O2peak was 59.0 ± 3.3 ml · kg−1 · min−1 (i.e. 90%[Vdot]O2max) and 50.6 ± 2.0 ml · kg−1 · min−1 (i.e. 97%[Vdot]O2max) respectively. The negative relationship (−0.77) between [Vdot]O2max and %[Vdot]O2max attained for all 15 runners was significant (P = 0.001). These results demonstrate that (i) reproducibility is good and (ii) that [Vdot]O2max is related to the %[Vdot]O2max achieved, with participants with a higher [Vdot]O2max achieving a lower %[Vdot]O2max in an 800-m trial on a treadmill.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.