Comparison of ergometer- and track-based testing in junior track-sprint cyclists. Implications for talent identification and development

ABSTRACT

Talent identification (TID) and talent development (TDE) programmes in track sprint cycling use ergometer- and track-based tests to select junior athletes and assess their development. The purpose of this study was to assess which tests are best at monitoring TID and TDE. Ten male participants (16.2 ± 1.1 year; 178.5 ± 6.0 cm and 73.6 ± 7.6 kg) were selected into the national TID squad based on initial testing. These tests consisted of two 6-s maximal sprints on a custom-built ergometer and 4 maximal track-based tests (2 rolling and 2 standing starts) using 2 gear ratios. Magnitude-based inferences and correlation coefficients assessed changes following a 3-month TDE programme. Training elicited meaningful improvements (80–100% likely) in all ergometer parameters. The standing and rolling small gear, track-based effort times were likely and very likely (3.2 ± 2.4% and 3.3 ± 1.9%, respectively) improved by training. Stronger correlations between ergometer- and track-based measures were very likely following training. Ergometer-based testing provides a more sensitive tool than track-based testing to monitor changes in neuromuscular function during the early stages of TDE. However, track-based testing can indicate skill-based improvements in performance when interpreted with ergometer testing. In combination, these tests provide information on overall talent development.

KEYWORDS:

• Track sprint cycling
• talent identification
• ergometer

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible with the support of the Australian Sports Commission and the Victorian Institute of Sport. The authors would like to particularly thank Mr Hilton Clarke for coaching the talent identified athletes and Associate Professor James Martin for his technical assistance during preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.