752
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Medicine and Biomechanics

Estimating fat-free mass in elite youth male soccer players: cross-validation of different field methods and development of prediction equation

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1197-1204 | Accepted 01 Mar 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

This study determined the most effective field method for quantifying fat-free mass (FFM) in elite youth male soccer players compared to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) values and to develop prediction equations for FFM based on anthropometric variables. Forty-one male elite-standard youth soccer players, ages 16.2–18.0 years, undertook FFM assessments including bioelectrical impedance analysis, and different skinfold-based prediction equations. DXA provided a criterion measure of FFM. Correlation coefficients, bias, limits of agreement, and differences were used as validity measures, and regression analyses to develop soccer-specific prediction equations. Slaughter et al (1988), Durnin and Wormersley (1974), and Sarria et al (1998) equations showed the lowest biases, and no significant, standardized, and substantial differences against DXA. The new youth soccer-specific anthropometric equation explained 91% of the DXA-derived FFM variance using three circumferences, eight skinfolds, and one bone breadth. All field methods compared in this study may not be adequate for estimating FFM in elite youth male soccer players, except the equations of Slaughter et al (1988), Durnin and Wormersley (1974), and Sarria et al (1998). We recommend the use of the new soccer-specific equation proposed in this study as a valid alternative to DXA to quantify FFM among elite youth male players.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank all the players and their parents that participated in the study for their collaboration. Gratefully acknowledge Research Group CTS-948 of Universidad Pablo de Olavide for their work and technical support to this research during the experiments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was made possible by NPRP grant #6-1526-3-363 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.