217
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Performance

Self-report or coach-rating? The predictive validity of different approaches to assess athletes’ achievement motivation in team and individual sports

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1645-1653 | Received 22 Sep 2022, Accepted 23 Nov 2023, Published online: 30 Nov 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The critical role of psychological features in talent identification research is well established. What remains open is how they should be captured, as self-report as well as coach-rating approaches can be subject to bias when used for talent selection purposes (e.g., social desirability and halo effect). The purpose of this study was to examine which of three different approaches (self-report, coach-rating, and a combination of both) to assess constructs related to achievement motivation offers the highest validity for predicting performance levels of youth athletes in individual and team sports over a two-year period using binary logistic regression models and the DeLong test. Descriptively, the combination model displayed the highest predictive validity, followed by coach-ratings and self-reports. However, only the comparison of the combination and self-report models displayed meaningful differences. The findings do not allow a definitive conclusion, but coach-ratings might be the least biased and most cost and time effective approach.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the support provided by Nina Schorno and Michael Schmid in collecting data and by Olivier Schmid in editing this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (CZ) upon reasonable request.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2023.2289271

Notes

1 No. 2015-12 -000,003.

2 Slightly different wording for AMBIS-T (see Zuber, Citation2022)

Additional information

Funding

This research project was supported and funded by Swiss Olympic and the Swiss Federal Office for Sport.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.