230
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Errata

Erratum

Page 825 | Published online: 19 Jun 2008

E. Mønness, K. Pearce and S. Coleman, Comparing a survey and a conjoint study: the future vision of water intermediaries, J. Appl. Statist. 35 (2008), pp. 19–30.

Due to production problems, changes requested by the authors at proof stage were not incorporated into the published version of the above article. The publisher wishes to apologise to the authors for this error.

On page 20 in the section entitled ‘The survey analysis’, the two references to ‘in the fifth section’ should be deleted.

On page 27, the first line under the figures should read ‘From Figures 3 and 4 we see that:’

In on page 28, there is an error in the first value for ‘Percent of total variance explained’. The corrected table, together with an added footnote, is reproduced below. The footnote also applies to Tables 5 and 8.

Table 7. Results from a factor analysis (with covariance-based PCA factor extraction, using VARIMAX rotated loadings) of the four part worths from each company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.