322
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

More on testing the normality assumptionin the Tobit Model

&
Pages 1345-1352 | Received 23 Apr 2008, Published online: 10 Nov 2009
 

Abstract

In a recent volume of this journal, Holden [Testing the normality assumption in the Tobit Model, J. Appl. Stat. 31 (2004) pp. 521–532] presents Monte Carlo evidence comparing several tests for departures from normality in the Tobit Model. This study adds to the work of Holden by considering another test, and several information criteria, for detecting departures from normality in the Tobit Model. The test given here is a modified likelihood ratio statistic based on a partially adaptive estimator of the Censored Regression Model using the approach of Caudill [A partially adaptive estimator for the Censored Regression Model based on a mixture of normal distributions, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Auburn University, 2007]. The information criteria examined include the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), the Consistent AIC (CAIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the Akaike’s BIC (ABIC). In terms of fewest ‘rejections’ of a true null, the best performance is exhibited by the CAIC and the BIC, although, like some of the statistics examined by Holden, there are computational difficulties with each.

JEL Classification :

Acknowledgement

The authors thank two anonymous referees and Robert Aykroyd for helpful comments on earlier versions. Any remaining errors are our own.

Notes

We are grateful to an anonymous referee for pointing this out.

Although technically the information criteria are not part of a statistical test, we use the word, rejection, in quotes to make our discussion less cumbersome since the MLR is actually a statistical test.

Most of the samples in the literature using Tobit estimation contain more than 150 observations. Using an EBSCO host search for articles using Tobit analysis from the year 2006 to the present yielded 53 articles. With the smallest and largest samples omitted, the average sample size is over 2300 observations, the median is 456 observations, and the 25th percentile estimate is over 170 observations.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 549.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.