134
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Critical values improvement for the standard normal homogeneity test by combining Monte Carlo and regression approaches

&
Pages 602-619 | Received 20 Sep 2013, Accepted 20 Apr 2016, Published online: 11 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

The distribution of the test statistics of homogeneity tests is often unknown, requiring the estimation of the critical values through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The computation of the critical values at low α, especially when the distribution of the statistics changes with the series length (sample cardinality), requires a considerable number of simulations to achieve a reasonable precision of the estimates (i.e. 106 simulations or more for each series length). If, in addition, the test requires a noteworthy computational effort, the estimation of the critical values may need unacceptably long runtimes.

To overcome the problem, the paper proposes a regression-based refinement of an initial MC estimate of the critical values, also allowing an approximation of the achieved improvement. Moreover, the paper presents an application of the method to two tests: SNHT (standard normal homogeneity test, widely used in climatology), and SNH2T (a version of SNHT showing a squared numerical complexity). For both, the paper reports the critical values for α ranging between 0.1 and 0.0001 (useful for the p-value estimation), and the series length ranging from 10 (widely adopted size in climatological change-point detection literature) to 70,000 elements (nearly the length of a daily data time series 200 years long), estimated with coefficients of variation within 0.22%. For SNHT, a comparison of our results with approximated, theoretically derived, critical values is also performed; we suggest adopting those values for the series exceeding 70,000 elements.

Acknowledgements

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) of the Italian Government is gratefully acknowledged for the scholarship granted that sustained this research. Professor Claudio Gandolfi, Giacomo Aletti and Anna Paganoni are also sincerely acknowledged for their support and for the useful suggestions. Finally, we thank the referees for their valuable work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental material (appendices)

Appendices A, B, and C are provided as supplemental material: Appendix A gives detailed information about the calibration process; Appendix B provides the tables concerning all the sets of parameters we calibrated for Equations (10), (11), and (14); Appendix C reports the complete proof of Equation (7).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 549.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.