1,820
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Travelling urban form: the neighbourhood unit in China

Pages 369-392 | Published online: 18 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

First formulated in the USA in the 1920s, the neighbourhood unit schema provides a model layout for an integral residential district. Over the past eight decades, the neighbourhood unit plan has traversed national boundaries and spread widely throughout the world. This article traces the multiple involvements of the schema and its variants in the process of modernization in China. Drawing upon Edward Said’s concept of ‘travelling theory’, the study reveals the complexities surrounding the appropriations, interpretations and reinventions of the neighbourhood schema in a constant flux of historical practices. The article shows that the domestication of the concept in China was a continual process of translating, selecting, combining and reinventing, instead of a direct borrowing of foreign ideas. It is concluded that the neighbourhood unit schema is far more than another sign of globalized repetition; instead, it is constantly tamed into different programmes of modernization in new times and places.

Notes

1. E. W. Said, The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.

2. Ibid., pp. 226–27.

3. The journal Inscriptions published a special issue on ‘Traveling theories and traveling theorists’ in 1989. For attempts to extend Said’s formulation, see, for example, J. Clifford, Notes on Travel and Theory. Inscriptions 5 (1989) 177–86; J. Clifford, Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997; L. H. Liu, Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity China, 19001937. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.

4. M. Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock, 1972; H. K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994; J. Marianne and L. Phillips, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage, 2002.

5. W. Benjamin, The Origin of German Tragic Drama. London: Verso, 1977, p. 45.

6. P. Wheatley, The Pivot of the Four Quarters: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Origin and Character of the Ancient Chinese City. Chicago: Aldine, 1971; K. Yang, Zhongguo gudai ducheng zhidu shi yanjiu [History of the Capital City System in Ancient China]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 1993; C. K. Heng, Cities of Aristocrats and Bureaucrats: The Development of Medieval Chinese Cityscapes. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1999.

7. L. Mumford, The City in History: Its origins, Its transformations, and Its Prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.

8. M. C. Boyer, Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.

9. E. Howard, To‐Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Swann Sonnenschein, 1898.

10. P. Hall, Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.

11. D. E. B. Weiner, Architecture and Social Reform in Late‐Victorian London. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994; M. Carson, Settlement Folk: Social Thought and the American Settlement Movement, 1885–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

12. C. H. Cooley, Social Organization: A study of the Larger Mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909.

13. E. W. Burgess, Can neighbourhood work have a scientific basis? in R.E. Park and E.W. Burgess (eds) The City. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1925, p. 147.

14. T. G. Birtles, Origins of the Neighbourhood Unit as a Twentieth Century Urban Residential Planning Ideal: A Tribute to Clarence Perry. Belconnen: University of Canberra, 1994, pp. 1–3.

15. Ibid., pp. 2–3.

16. E. R. A. Seligman (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 4. London: Macmillan, 1934, p. 250.

17. J. Dahir, The Neighborhood Unit Plan: Its Spread and Acceptance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1947, p. 24.

18. C. A. Perry, The relation of neighborhood forces to the larger community: planning a city neighborhood from the social point of view, in Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work (51st Annual Session). 1924, pp. 415–19. Located on Long Island, Forest Hills Gardens was an estate planned by Frederich Olmsted, the younger, and developed by the Sage Foundation Homes Company. Its design featured clear boundaries on two sides, a differentiated local street system, the public school at a central location and variations in house size and cost, among others. It was built on 175 acres of open land and had a population of nearly 4000 by 1923. Perry was one of the earliest residents when the first homes were occupied in 1912. He played an active role in the development of various community facilities. See T. G. Birtles, op. cit. [Footnote14], pp. 17–19.

19. C. A. Perry, The local community as a unit in the planning of urban residential areas, in C. A. Perry, The Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1926, pp. 238–41.

20. C. A. Perry, Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs, Volume VII: Neighborhood and Community Planning. New York: Committee on Regional Plan of New York and its Environs, 1929.

21. See L. Mumford, Introduction, in C. S. Stein (ed.) Toward New Towns for American. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1951. For a more recent argument, see N. N. Patricios, The Neighborhood Concept: a retrospective of physical design and social interaction. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 19, 1 (2002) 70–90. Donald L. Johnson maintains that the idea of the neighbourhood unit was first raised by the Chicago‐based architect William E. Drummond during 1913–1922. See D. L. Johnson, Origins of the neighbourhood unit. Planning Perspectives 17 (2002) 227–245.

22. C. A. Perry, op. cit. [Footnote20].

23. T. B. Augur, Some minimum standards in site planning for low‐cost housing, in Proceedings, Joint National Conference on Housing, Washington. Chicago: National Association of Housing Officials, 1935.

24. Chicago Plan Commission, Preliminary Comprehensive City Plan of Chicago. Chicago, 1946.

25. Federal Housing Administration, Successful Subdivisions: Planned as Neighborhoods for Profitable Investment and Appeal to Home Owners. Land Planning Bulletin No. 1, Washington, 1941.

26. J. Dahir, op. cit. [Footnote17], p. 70.

27. Rationelle Bebauungsweisen (Rational Lot‐Division): A Report of the Third Congress of the C.I.A.M. Frankfort, 1931. Quoted from J. Dahir, ibid., p. 71.

28. Ministry of Health, Design of Dwellings (The Dudley Report).HMSO: London, 1944. Ministry of Housing, The Housing Manual. London: HMSO, 1944.

29. T. G. Birtles, op. cit. [Footnote14], pp. 32–33.

30. A. Goss, Neighbourhood units in British New Towns. Town Planning Review 32, 1 (1961) 66–82; G. Burke, Towns in the Making. London: Edward Arnold, 1971.

31. S. Shaked, Physical planning in Israel, in Israel Builds 1970: Interdisciplinary Planning. Jerusalem: Ministry of Housing, 1970.

32. National Capital Development Commission, The Future Canberra: A Long Range Plan for Land Use and Civic Design. Sydney: Angus Robertson, 1965; G. E. Moseley, Residential area planning in Canberra. New Zealand Surveyor 27 (1974) 474–94; G. J. R. Linge, Canberra: Site and City. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1975.

33. E. C. Kaufmann, Neighbourhood units as new elements of town planning. Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects 44 (1936) 165–75.

34. J. Holston, The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasilia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, chapter 5.

35. R. Kalia, Chandigarh: The Making of an Indian City. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.

36. D. D. Buck, Railway city and national capital: two faces of the modern, in J. W. Esherick (ed.) Remaking the Chinese City: Modernity and National Identity, 19001950. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000, pp. 65–89; D. V. Tucher, Building our Manchukuo: Japanese city planning, architecture, and nation‐building in occupied northeast China, 1931–1945. PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1999; B. Li, Riben zai zhongguo de zhanlingdi de chengshi guihua lishi yanjiu [The historical research of the city planning of the Japanese occupied areas in China]. PhD dissertation, Tongji University, 1997; Q. Guo, Changchun: unfinished capital planning of Manzhouguo, 1932–42. Urban History 31, 1 (2004) 100–17; C. W. Pannell, Past and present city structure in China. Town and Planning Review 48, 2 (1977) 149–56.

37. D. D. Buck, ibid., pp. 79–84; D. V. Tucher, ibid., chapter 8.

38. Although Japan imported quite a few Western planning ideas at the time, there were few opportunities to apply them in Japanese cities due to land ownership and weak planning powers. Japanese colonies offered new laboratories for the realization of modern urban plans. See, C. Hein, Rebuilding Japanese cities after 1945, in C. Hein, J. M. Diefendorf and Y. Ishida (eds) Rebuilding Urban Japan after 1945. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 1–16; D. V. Tucher, ibid., chapter 3.

39. B. Li, op. cit. [Footnote36], p. 228.

40. Ibid., p. 226.

41. Ibid., pp. 231–2.

42. D. V. Tucher, op. cit. [Footnote36], p. 153.

43. Ibid., pp. 153–9.

44. B. Li, op. cit. [Footnote36], p. 256.

45. D. V. Tucher, op. cit. [Footnote36], p. 163.

46. Y. Uchida, Daido toshi keikakuan ni tsuite, 1 [On Datong urban planning proposal, 1]. Kenchiku zasshi, 53, 657 (1939) 1281–95; Y. Uchida, Daido toshi keikakuan ni tsuite, 2 [On Datong urban planning proposal, 2]. Kenchiku zasshi, 53, 658 (1939) 1355–60; D. V. Tucher, ibid., p. 153.

47. J. W. Esherick, Remaking the Chinese City: Modernity and National Identity. 19001950. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000.

48. J. W. Cody, American Planning in Republican China. Planning Perspectives 11 (1996) 339–77; J. W. Cody, Exporting American architecture, 1870–2000. London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 109–19; J. W. Cody, Columbia Circle – an obscured Shanghai suburb, 1928–1932. Dialogue 23 (1999) 130–5.

49. J. Dong, Zhongguo chengshi jianshe shi [Chinese urban construction history]. Beijing: Zhongguo jianzhu gongye chubanshe, 1999, pp. 257–9.

50. N. J. Gordon, China and the neighborhood unit. The American City 61 (1949) 112–13.

51. M. R. Dutton, Policing and Punishment in China: From Patriarchy to the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 85–8.

52. N. J. Gordon, op. cit. [Footnote50], p. 113.

53. Ibid., p. 113.

54. K. L. MacPherson, Designing Chinas urban future: the greater Shanghai plan, 1927–37. Planning Perspectives 5 (1990) 39–62; K. L. MacPherson, Erzhan hou shanghai de chengshi guihua: 1945–1949 nian [Post‐World War II planning in Shanghai, 1945–49], in X. Wang and K. Huang (eds) Chengshi shehui de pianjian [The Evolution of Urban Societies]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1998, pp. 322–37; W. Wang, Shanghai jindai chengshi guihua shi gailun [An outline of the history of city planning in modern Shanghai]. PhD dissertation, Tongji University, 2004, pp. 38–41; C. Wang, Greater Shanghai plan: a nationalist utopia. Dialogue 23 (1999) 62–7.

55. W. Wang, ibid., pp. 51–2.

56. K. L. MacPherson, Erzhan hou shanghai …, op. cit. [Footnote54], pp. 325–6.

57. W. Wang, op. cit. [Footnote54], pp. 51–2.

58. J. Dong, op. cit. [Footnote49], pp. 209–12.

59. W. Wang, op. cit. [Footnote54], pp. 51–2.

60. Y. Peng, Xin dushi linli jihua qianshuo [A preliminary introduction to new urban neighbourhood planning]. Jianshe pinglun [Construction Review] 1, 7 (1948) 18–22.

61. Z. Yi, Zhuzhai de jiti sheji [Collective housing design]. Jianshe pinglun [Construction Review] 1, 4 (1948) 6–10.

62. L. J. C. Ma and E. W. Hanten (eds), Urban Development in Modern China. Boulder: Westview Press, 1981.

63. R. Y. Kwok, Trends of urban planning and development in China, in L. J. C. Ma and E. W. Hanten (eds), ibid., pp. 147–93.

64. Interview with Dingzeng Wang, 30 October 2004.

65. D. Wang, Shiqu congjian yu jiejue fanghuang [Urban redevelopment and housing scarcity]. Jianshe pinglun [Construction Review] 1, 2 (1947) 5–6.

66. D. Wang, Shanghai caoyang xincun zhuzhaiqu de guihua sheji [The planning of Shanghai Caoyang new village residential district]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 2 (1956) 1–15.

67. J. D. Spence, To Change China: Western Advisors in China, 16201960. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1969, p. 282.

68. D. Wang, op. cit. [Footnote66], p. 2.

69. Ibid.

70. H. Li, Baiwanzhuang zhuzhaiqu he guomian yi chang shenghuo qu diaocha [A survey of Baiwanzhuang Residential District and the living quarter of Guomian No. 1 Plant]. Jianzhu xuebao [Journal of Architecture] 6 (1956) 19–28; Huadong gongye jianzhu shejiyuan, Fu dongbei mochang juzhuqu xiangxi guihua sheji de neirong jieshao [An introduction to the detailed design for the residential district of a factory in northeast China (attached)]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 2 (1955) 24–39.

71. Y. Wang, Guanyu juzhuqu guihua sheji xingshi de taolun [On the planning design of the form of the residential district]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 5 (1956) 51–7.

72. A. Åman, Architecture and Ideology in Eastern Europe during the Stalin Era: An Aspect of Cold War History. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992, p. 215.

73. J. Lü, P. Rowe and J. Zhang, Modern Urban Housing in China, 18402000. Munich: Prestel, 2001, pp. 128–30.

74. J. S. Garner, The Company Town: Architecture and Society in the Early Industrial Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

75. M. Crawford, Building the Workingmans’ Paradise: The Design of American Company Towns. London: Verso, 1995; J. B. Allen, The Company Town in the American West. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1966.

76. M. Crawford, ibid., pp. 137–40.

77. G. Castillo, Stalinist modern: constructivism and the Soviet company town, in J. Cracraft and D. Rowland (eds) Architectures of Russian identity: 1500 to the Present. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003, pp. 135–49; J. W. Cody, Exporting American architecture …, op. cit. [Footnote48], pp. 100–8.

78. G. Castillo, ibid.; F. Bucci, Albert Kahn: Architect of Ford. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1993, pp. 90–6; J. Cohen, Le Corbusier and the Mystique of the USSR: Theories and Projects for Moscow, 1928–1936. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992, p. 198; J. W. Cody, ibid..

79. G. Castillo, ibid.

80. R. A. French and F. E. I. Hamilton, Is there a socialist city? in R. A. French and F. E. I. Hamilton (eds) The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. Chichester: Wiley, 1979, pp. 1–22.

81. J. H. Bater, The Soviet City. London: Edward Arnold, 1980, p. 24; N. A. Miliutin, Sotsgorod: The Problem of Building Socialist Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1974.

82. G. Castillo, op. cit. [Footnote77], pp. 140–1.

83. H. Wang, Women dui dongbei mochang juzhuqu guihua sheji gongzuo de jiancha [Our self‐criticism on residential planning for a factory in northeast China]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 2 (1955) 20–40.

84. Nongyebu changbu guihuazu, Guoying nongchang changbu guihua sheji litu jieshao [An introduction to standard planning drawings for state farms]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 3 (1956) 68–77.

85. D. Zhao, Lun yiyuan jianzhu [On hospital construction]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1956) 32–83.

86. L. Sawers, Cities and countryside in the Soviet Union and China, in W. K. Tabb and L. Sawers (eds) Marxism and the Metropolis: New Perspectives in Urban Political Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, pp. 338–64; J. H. Bater, op. cit. [Footnote81], pp. 109–11.

87. M. Teweiersikeyi, Zhuzhai jiefang xiaoqu [Housing, neighbourhood and microdistrict]. Chengshi jianshe yicong [Translated Articles in Urban Construction] 14, 7 (1956) 16.

88. V. F. S. Sit, Beijing: The Nature and Planning of a Chinese Capital City. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1995, pp. 96–7.

89. L. Taneff, Chengshi zhuzhaiqu de guihua he jianzhu [Planning and construction of an urban residential district]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1958) 23–31.

90. J. Xu and R. Fang, Shanghai hudong zhuzhaiqu guihua sheji de yantao [On the planning of Hudong Residential District, Shanghai]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1958) 1–9; S. Fu et al., Beijingshi xizhaosi juzhu xiaoqu guihua fangan jieshao [An introduction to the planning proposal for Xizhaosi Microdistrict, Beijing]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1958) 10–16; D. Zhao et al., Beijingshi baizifang juzhu xiaoqu gaijian guihua fangan [Redevelopment planning proposal for Baizifang Microdistrict, Beijing]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1958) 17–22.

91. J. Xu and R. Fang, ibid., p. 9.

92. D. Lu, Utopia and Third World modernism: designing the peoples commune in China, 1958–1960. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia & New Zealand. September 2005 (Napier, New Zealand), pp. 223–9.

93. See, for example, X. Pei et al., Renmin gongshe de guihua wenti [Problems in commune planning]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 9 (1958) 9–14; S. Wang and J. Cheng, Jumindian fengbu guihua de yanjiu [Research on the distribution of residential clusters]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1959) 10–14; L. Wu, Guanyu renmin gongshe guihua zhong de jige wenti de tantao [A discussion of several problems in the planning of the people’s commune]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 1 (1959) 1–3.

94. D. Wang and C. Xu, Juzhu jianzhu guihua sheji zhong jige wenti de tantao [On several issues in residential planning]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 2 (1962) 6–13.

95. Y. Shui, Guowai zhuzhaiqu he xiaoqu de xingzhi yu guimo [The nature and scale of foreign residential districts and microdistricts]. Jianzhu xuebao [Architectural Journal] 11 (1962) 21–2.

96. Ibid., p. 22.

97. Juzhuqu xiangxi guihua keti yanjiu zu, Juzhuqu guihua sheji [Residential District Planning]. Beijing: Zhongguo jianzhu gongye chubanshe, 1985.

98. D. Lu, Remaking Chinese Urban Form: Modernity, Scarcity and Space, 1949–2005. London: Routledge, 2006, chapter 4.

99. X. Lü and E. J. Perry (eds), Danwei: The Changing Chinese Workplace in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1997; X. Yang and Y. Zhou, Zhongguo danwei zhidu [The Chinese Work Unit System]. Beijing: Zhongguo jingji chubanshe, 1999.

100. D. Lu, op. cit. [Footnote98], chapter 4.

101. Ibid., chapter 3.

102. E. M. Bjorklund, The danwei: social–spatial characteristics of work units in Chinas urban society. Economic Geography 1 (1986) 19–29; P. R. Gaubatz, Urban transformation in post‐Mao China: impacts of the reform era on Chinas urban form, in D. S. Davis et al. (eds) Urban Spaces in Contemporary China: The Potential for Autonomy and Community in Post‐Mao China. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1995, pp. 28–60.

103. Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars, China, Inside the Peoples Republic. New York: Bantam Books, 1972.

104. Zhongguo chengshi jianshe nianjian [Yearbook of Urban Construction in China]. Beijing: Zhongguo jianzhu gongye chubanshe, 1989.

105. L. J. C. Ma and F. Wu, Restructuring the Chinese City. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005; A. G. O. Yeh and F. Wu, The Transformation of the Urban Planning System in China from a Centrally‐planned to Transitional Economy. Oxford: Pergamon, 1999.

106. X. Chen, Urban economic reform and public housing investment in China. Urban Affairs Quarterly 29 (1993) 117–45; Y. Wang, Public‐sector housing in urban China 1949–1988. Housing Studies 10, 1 (1995) 57–82; F. Wu, Changes in the structure of public housing provision in urban China. Urban Studies 33, 9 (1996) 1601–27.

107. Y. Min. Housing Layout and Space Use: A Study of Swedish and Chinese Neighbourhood Units. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology, 1993, pp. 51–60.

108. D. Lu, The latency of tradition: on the vicissitudes of walls in contemporary China, in N. AlSayyad (ed.) End of Tradition. New York: Routledge, 2004, pp. 210–30; Y. Huang, From work‐unit compounds to gated communities: housing inequality and residential segregation intransitional Beijing, in L. J. C. Ma and F. Wu (eds), op. cit. [Footnote105], pp. 192–221; E. Blakely and M. G. Snyder, Fortress USA: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1999; T. P. R. Caldeira, City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.

109. D. Bray, Social Space and Governance in Urban China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005, chapter 7; J. Howell (ed.), Governance in China. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC., 2004.

110. D. Bray, Building community: new strategies of governance in urban China. Seminar paper presented at the University of Sydney 6 October 2005; J. Zhang, Neighborhood‐level governance: the growing social foundation of a public sphere, in J. Howell (ed.), ibid., pp. 121–42.

111. Interview with a Beijing resident, 2 February 2005.

112. Ibid. [110].

113. J. Clifford, Notes on Travel … , op. cit. [Footnote3], p. 179.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Duanfang Lu

Duanfang Lu is Lecturer in the Faculty of Architecture at the University of Sydney, Australia. She holds a BArch degree from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, and has a PhD in Architecture from the University of California, Berkeley. She is the author of Remaking Chinese Urban Form: Modernity, Scarcity and Space, 1949–2005 (Routledge, 2006).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 813.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.