3,175
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining housing discrimination across race, gender and felony history

, &
Pages 761-778 | Received 14 Sep 2017, Accepted 08 May 2018, Published online: 08 Jun 2018
 

Abstract

Those who have been convicted of crimes are subjected to a stigma that affects many aspects of their social lives. The “felon” label brings collateral consequences that make it difficult to obtain basic human needs, including housing. This study uses the audit method to examine the effects of race, gender, and criminal history on housing outcomes. Testers, exhibiting characteristics suggestive of race and gender and disclosing one of three offenses, placed phone calls to rental property owners across the Midwest to inquire about renting a property. We found powerful negative effects for those with a criminal record seeking apartments, regardless of whether the offense was sexual or drug-related. However, we found no differences between minority and non-minority testers. We explain these findings in the context of housing as an essential resource for formerly incarcerated individuals.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jasmin Whitfield, Roy Ruiz, Mabel Mendez, Anthony LaRosa, Richard Pena, Cheradyn Pettit, Baboucarr Bah, Michael Madden, Kimberly Jones and Chanel Garcia for their help with this project. Their work was indispensable in completing the study. This work could not have been completed without their efforts.

Notes

1. The difference between the two is that landlords own the properties and rent them directly to tenants, whereas property managers operate and handle the business end of real estate property that someone else owns.

2. Many audit studies use paired testers – one tester displays or conveys the treatment/experimental manipulation and the other tester acts as a case control. Pairs are rotated with each case. For the current study we opted against paired testers because our initial research, in which we paired testers, and a follow up study in which we did not, both indicated near unanimous landlord and agent consideration in the control (no offence) condition (Evans, Citation2016; Evans & Porter, Citation2015).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 332.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.