Notes
1. The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies is composed of the following: Chapter One: ‘Navigating the Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies’, Rubén Arcos, Nicole K. Drumhiller, and Mark Phythian; Chapter Two: ‘Being on the Outside Looking In: Reflections of a Former Practitioner Turned Academic’, David Omand; Chapter Three: ‘Neither Knuckle-Draggers nor Carpetbaggers: Proposing the Periclean Ideal for Intelligence Educators’, Nicholas Dujmović; Chapter Four: ‘Intelligence, Science, and the Ignorance Hypothesis’, David R. Mandel; Chapter Five: ‘Intelligence and the US Army War College: The Academic-Practitioner Relationship in Professional Military Education’, Genevieve Lester, James G. Breckenridge, and Thomas Spahr; Chapter Six; ‘Assessing the Quality of Strategic Intelligence Products: Cooperation and Competition between Scholars and Practitioners’, José-Miguel Palacios; Chapter Seven: ’Lessons Learned for the Private-Sector Intelligence Analyst’, Michael J. Ard; Chapter Eight: ‘Understanding and Countering Hybrid Threats through a Comprehensive and Multinational Approach: The Role of Intelligence’, Rasmus Hindrén and Hanna Smith; Chapter Nine: ‘Building Ecosystems of Intelligence Education: “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”’, Irena Chiru and Adrian-Liviu Ivan; Chapter Ten: The Academic-Practitioner Relationship in France: From Strangers to Partners’, Damien Van Puyvelde; Chapter Eleven: ‘Playing to Our Strengths: Combining Academic Rigor and Practitioner Experience in Delivering Intelligence Education in Australia’, Troy Whitford and Charles Vandepeer; Chapter Twelve: ‘The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence: A Latin American Perspective’, Andrés de Castro Garcia and Carolina Sancho Hirane; Chapter Thirteen: ‘Teaching Ethical Intelligence in a World That Doesn’t Think It Needs It’, Jan Goldman; Chapter Fourteen: ‘Bridging the Divide’, Rubén Arcos, Nicole K. Drumhiller, and Mark Phythian.
2. Arcos, Drumhiller and Phythian, The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies, “Navigating the Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies,” 1-40.
3. Ibid., 8.
4. Ibid., 17.
5. Ibid., “Intelligence, Science, and the Ignorance Hypothesis,” 88.
6. Ibid., “The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence: A Latin-American Perspective,” 219-236.
7. Ibid., “Being on the Outside Looking In,” 55.