![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: Quantitative measures of discourse skills of adults with aphasia can be valuable in documenting evidenced‐based practice. Comprehensive assessment of narrative discourse should include a measure of the ability to relay main events (Nicholas & Brookshire, Citation1995; Wright, Capilouto, Wagovich, Cranfill, & Davis, Citation2005). Wright et al. (Citation2005) compared the ability of younger and older healthy adults to relate main events in response to pictured stimuli. Results indicated that the younger group produced a significantly higher proportion of main events as compared to the older group and that the main events measure was stable for individual participants over time. However, performance data and data supporting the stability of the main events measure for individuals with aphasia are needed to extend the clinical usefulness of the main events measure as an assessment tool.
Aims: The purpose of this study was (a) to compare the performance of healthy adults and adults with aphasia on their ability to convey main events in pictured stimuli and (b) to establish session‐to‐session reliability of the authors' main events measure.
Methods & Procedures: Eight adults with aphasia (APH) and eight neurologically intact adults (NI) participated in the study. Participants attended two sessions, 7–21 days apart. Each time, participants gave an account of the events from two pictures and two picture sequences (Nicholas & Brookshire, Citation1993). The resulting language samples were analysed for the proportion of main events conveyed, and test–retest reliability of the measure was assessed.
Outcomes & Results: NI adults told a significantly higher proportion of main events than adults with aphasia. The main effect for picture stimulus was also significant; participants told significantly more main events in response to sequential versus single picture stimuli, regardless of group. Test–retest results yielded strong, positive correlations between sessions for both groups.
Conclusions: Results indicate that adults with and without aphasia differ in their ability to express the relations and causal links among units of information. Results also indicate that Wright and colleagues' (Citation2005) main events measure demonstrates sufficient stability to provide the foundation for its potential use as a pre‐ and post‐treatment measure. Finally, the finding that the proportion of main events provided in response to stimuli varied according to the nature of the stimuli is consistent with the findings of Wright et al. (Citation2005) and suggests that even for individuals with aphasia, relationships between elements depicted in pictures may be more easily identified and conveyed when sequential pictures are provided as stimuli.