684
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

What goes wrong during passive sentence production in agrammatic aphasia: An eyetracking study

&
Pages 1576-1592 | Received 25 Jul 2009, Accepted 05 Feb 2010, Published online: 12 Jul 2010
 

Abstract

Background: Production of passive sentences is often impaired in agrammatic aphasia and has been attributed both to an underlying structural impairment (e.g., Schwartz, Saffran, Fink, Myers, & Martin, Citation1994) and to a morphological deficit (e.g., Caplan & Hanna, Citation1998; Faroqi-Shah & Thompson, Citation2003). However, the nature of the deficit in passive sentence production is not clear due to methodological issues present in previous studies.

Aims: This study examined active and passive sentence production in nine agrammatic aphasic speakers under conditions of structural priming using eyetracking to test whether structural impairments occur independently of morphological impairments and whether the underlying nature of error types is reflected in on-line measures, i.e., eye movements and speech onset latencies.

Methods & Procedures: Nine participants viewed and listened to a prime sentence in either active or passive voice, and then repeated it aloud. Next, a target picture appeared on the computer monitor and participants were instructed to describe it using the primed sentence structure.

Outcomes & Results: Participants made substantial errors in sentence structure, i.e., passives with role reversals (RRs) and actives-for-passives, but few errors in passive morphology. Longer gaze durations to the first-produced noun for passives with RRs as compared to correct passives were found before and during speech. For actives-for-passives, however, this pattern was found during speech, but not before speech.

Conclusions: The deficit in passive sentence production does not solely arise from a morphological deficit, rather it stems, at least in part, from a structural level impairment. The underlying nature of passives with RRs is qualitatively different from that of actives-for-passives, which cannot be clearly differentiated with off-line testing methodology.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the NIH grant R01-DC01948 awarded to Cynthia K. Thompson. Earlier versions of this work were presented at the 39th Clinical Aphasiology Conference and the 47th Academy of Aphasia. The authors wish to thank persons with aphasia who participated in this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.