Abstract
Background: Novel word learning of persons with aphasia is little studied, even though a better understanding of learning processes would inform development of effective treatment strategies. Recent evidence suggests some remaining verbal learning capacity in persons with aphasia. Long-term maintenance of newly learned active vocabulary has not been reported previously in persons with aphasia.
Aims: To explore learning and long-term maintenance of novel words in persons with aphasia.
Methods & Procedures: Two English-speaking males with chronic anomic aphasia and two age-matched controls were taught novel names of 20 unfamiliar objects. Half of the words were taught with semantic information (definition) and half without. Participants were instructed to learn the names. The experiment included four training sessions, one post-training test and four follow-up tests administered 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-training. We tested explicit learning of the new names through visual confrontation naming. In addition, incidental learning of semantic information was probed over the follow-up period.
Outcomes & Results: The two participants with aphasia learned 6–8 of the 20 novel names during the training. However, this new vocabulary dissipated during the 6-month follow-up. As expected, the controls showed better performance both in acquisition and in maintenance of the new vocabulary over the follow-up period. As regards the accuracy of semantic information, the aphasic participant with semantic impairment demonstrated worse incidental learning of semantic information than controls and the participant with intact lexical semantics.
Conclusions: Some new vocabulary can be acquired even in chronic aphasia but the ability to spontaneously retrieve the newly learned words gradually dissipates over the weeks following learning. Our results also indicate an interaction between the level of lexical-semantic processing skills and incidental learning of new lexical-semantic knowledge in aphasia.
Keywords:
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by NIDCD R01 DC01924 granted to Temple University (PI: Nadine Martin), the Finnish Graduate School in Language Studies Langnet, and grants from the Research Institute of the Abo Akademi University Foundation, the Oskar Öflund Foundation and the TOP Foundation. ML was supported by a personal grant from the Academy of Finland. We are thankful to Samantha Rosenberg MA for conducting some of the follow-up measurements of this study.
Notes
1D-prime scores were not calculated for the overall recognition test due to the participants' high performances on this test.