367
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

On the presence and absence of that in aphasia

&
Pages 62-81 | Received 23 Feb 2013, Accepted 20 Jul 2013, Published online: 28 Aug 2013
 

Abstract

Background: Deficits in the production of complex structures have been widely documented in non-fluent forms of aphasia. Nevertheless, the data available on fluent deficits are scarcer. In both cases, reduced complexity is attributed to syntactic factors. In the related field of syntactic theory, there exist a number of studies on the production of non-brain damaged (NBD) subjects which try to account for the existence of two alternative constructions in embedded complement clauses in English (as in I think that the situation will improve/I think the situation will improve). The absence of that in the embedded clauses of verbs like say, know or think in colloquial English is very frequent and this suggests that verbs of this type may select a clause lacking a complementiser phrase (CP) layer, namely tense phrase (TP). The presence of that is taken to be the result of insertion, which is triggered by cues associated to contextual factors like register.

Aims: To compare the presence and absence of the complementiser that in the speech of English subjects diagnosed with aphasia with the same phenomenon in NBD subjects with the objective of clarifying the nature of the phenomenon of that-omission.

Methods & Procedures: We carried out an analysis of spontaneous speech that included the performance of 200 individuals brought together by the AphasiaBank project. Two groups were included in the study, an experimental group comprising 100 individuals diagnosed as aphasic according to the standards of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), and a control group including 100 non-brain damaged control subjects ( NBDs).

Outcomes & Results: This study shows that the asymmetries across populations (NBDs vs. subjects with aphasia) are restricted to the number of occurrences of subordinate clauses. NBD subjects produce more embeddings than subjects diagnosed with fluent aphasia (although they do produce embedded clauses and crucially prefer the “omission” option) and subjects with non-fluent aphasia.

Conclusions: Our results confirm the findings on fluent aphasias as for the presence of deficits with complex constructions. These results may be regarded as evidence for the claim that TP is the default selection for the verbs analysed.

Part of the research reported here has benefitted from the projects granted by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (FFI2012–35058 and FFI2010-20634) and the research grant Beatriu de Pinós from the Generalitat de Catalunya. The authors thank Brian MacWhinney for allowing them to use data from AphasiaBank. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped them to improve the article.

Notes

2. 1 The only exception is CMU01a, which includes the narration of pleasant and scary experiences together with something that caused a big impact on the subject, the description of the Rockwell and the Cookie theft pictures, and the story of The Three Bears (together with the stroke description, the Cinderella story and the process of making a sandwich).

3. 2 In the Wright corpus (Wright, Citation2008), in addition to the AphasiaBank protocol, the Wright protocol is also implemented. The latter includes concepts such as beach, birthday, directions, couple, holidays, weekend or vacation with and without picture support to elicit spontaneous speech.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.