2,011
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Intensive sound production treatment for severe, chronic apraxia of speech

, , &
Pages 1164-1181 | Received 14 Feb 2019, Accepted 01 Aug 2019, Published online: 17 Aug 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Massed practice has become a widely used method of treatment administration in the study of aphasia. It is often shown to be as or more effective than treatment provided in a distributed fashion. Some studies report changes beyond the targeted treatment materials, and durability of effects tends to be positive. Feasibility of this specific dosage for Sound Production Training (SPT) for apraxia of speech has yet to be tested.

Aims

This case study investigates the effects of a massed practice administration of SPT for a patient with severe and chronic apraxia of speech. Responsiveness was monitored for target treatment items at the level of the word and the manner of articulation. In addition, we assessed for changes in general aphasia severity, patient perception of communicative effectiveness, and ability to self-correct errors.

Methods & Procedures

SPT was administered for 3 h per weekday over 2 weeks. All sessions were audiotaped and analyzed independently by two raters. Initial responses were coded as correct or incorrect and then re-analyzed for each manner of articulation within each word. The total number of correct and incorrect self-corrections were also recorded. Multiple baselines across behaviors was used to track progress on trained materials.

Outcomes & Results

Improvements were observed on the accuracy of trained repeated productions, untrained equivalent exemplars, increased self-corrections, and also in reduced aphasia severity. There was no observed benefit to increased repetitions of a specific manner of articulation.

Conclusions

Massed practice is a viable way to administer SPT and may also positively impact non-targeted treatment items and objectives. Self-correction attempts precede or coincide with production accuracy and may be worth training in patients who do not spontaneously self-correct. Since increased repetitions did not improve a specific manner of speech, we speculate that the use of functional words versus those targeting specific phonemes may be as effective at eliciting desired speech outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Portions of this work were presented at the 2016 annual convention of the American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association in Philadelphia, PA.

This work was made possible by the dedication and expertise provided by two student clinicians, Alyssa Fazzino, and Paul Degoursey. In addition, we thank the participant and spouse for their persistence and commitment to this rigorous program of treatment.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data Availability

Standardized test scores and all data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Additional information

Funding

Dr. Jennifer Mozeiko and Dr. Carl Coelho performed this research as part of their employment at the University of Connecticut. Victoria Abolafia and Abigail Garneau were unpaid, undergraduate research assistants at the University of Connecticut during the time of this research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.