Aphasia and dysphasia on the internet

ABSTRACT

Background

In 2015, researchers called for the preferred use of the term “aphasia” and the elimination of the term “dysphasia”. They determined that speech-language pathologists, researchers and consumer organizations prefer the term “aphasia”. However, individuals with aphasia, their family members and friends are faced with a probably unknown disorder and may rely on the internet to provide the information they need.

Aims

To determine the frequency and use of the terms “aphasia” and “dysphasia” on publicly accessible websites.

Method

Using the Google search engine, three searches (general, news and Google Scholar) were conducted for the terms “aphasia” and “dysphasia” for the year 2019.

Results

A survey of the terms “aphasia” and “dysphasia” in 2019 reveals a reduced frequency of the latter term in general searches, news and accessible scholarly publications. However, the term continues to be used inconsistently and inaccurately. In general searches, a layperson had only around 50% chance of obtaining a correct explanation of dysphasia as a language disorder. In news items, only around one-third correctly identified dysphasia as a language disorder.

Conclusions

Although the use of the term “dysphasia” has reduced compared to “aphasia” in internet searches, confusion and inaccuracy surrounding the meaning of these two terms persists. There is still a need for greater advocacy and awareness raising regarding accurate terminology amongst the wider society and the professional community. Only by doing this, can everyone affected by aphasia gain relevant and appropriate healthcare, support and opportunities.

KEYWORDS:

• Aphasia
• dysphasia
• stroke
• terminology
• awareness

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.