169
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Research gaps in Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs: A qualitative study

, Ph.D, , Ph.D, &
Received 27 Sep 2023, Accepted 14 Dec 2023, Published online: 13 Feb 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs (ICAPs) provide a variety of therapies for cohorts of individuals with aphasia. Converging evidence for proof of concept and acceptability data demonstrates that ICAPs improve patient outcomes; however, efforts to build the ICAP evidence base are vital to optimize its implementation and justify potential reimbursement.

Aims

This qualitative study characterizes evidence gaps in the ICAP literature base from the perspective of international aphasiologists who implement ICAPs.

Methods

Seven international ICAP program leaders participated in semi-structured interviews. A four-stage qualitative content analysis approach was applied by three trained independent raters to organize and elicit meaning from transcribed interviews. This qualitative study was approved by Idaho State University IRB (IRB-FY2021-270).

Results

Program access was a prominent theme with subthemes of treatment candidacy (participant characteristics; cohort makeup), program scalability, telehealth options, and stakeholder needs. The second theme was program structure with subthemes of optimizing treatment dose, standardizing outcome measures, refining ICAP comprehensive components, defining the wide array of delivery model applications, and sustainability considerations.

Conclusions

The ICAP evidence gap themes described in this study are integral to establishing a call to action for ICAP researchers and others who are fervent about intensive aphasia rehabilitation models. Building the ICAP evidence base will help to optimize implementation, justify potential reimbursement to insurers, contribute to the sustainability of this innovative service delivery model, and maximize rehabilitation options for individuals with aphasia.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.