ABSTRACT
This response considers whether it is possible to think of listening as a non-coercive alternative to ‘the gaze’. An attention to the work of ancient and modern thinkers provides a starting point for conceptualizing musical ‘possession’ in a way that is not bound to asymmetrical, subject–object relations.
Notes
1Maurice Blanchot, The Space of Literature, trans. Ann Smock (Lincoln, NE, 1982), 172–3.
2Plato, Ion, Early Socratic Dialogues, trans. and ed. Trevor J. Saunders (Harmondsworth, 1987), 49–65 (p. 55; emphasis of last sentence added).
3Plato, The Republic, trans. Tom Griffith, ed. Giovanni R. F. Ferrari (Cambridge, 2000), 320.
4See Gregory Nagy, Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond (Cambridge, 1996), 5–103; and idem, ‘Homer and Plato at the Panathenaia: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives’, Contextualizing Classics, ed. Thomas M. Falkner, Nancy Felson and David Konstan (Lanham, MD, 1999), 127–55.
5Friedrich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. and ed. Walter Kaufmann (New York, 1967), 61.
6Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals, trans. and ed. Kaufmann, 57–8.
7August Wilhelm Schlegel, ‘From Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature’, German Romantic Criticism, ed. Leslie Willson (New York, 1982), 175–218 (pp. 183–4).