![Sample our Geography journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5937/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Geography.jpg"})
Abstract
This paper discusses current challenges, expectations and practices related to an increasingly applied normative concept, namely that of planning to become (or to maintain) a ‘polycentric’ metropolitan area. Based on findings provided by a group of spatial planners from 12 metropolitan areas across Europe, the concept of polycentricity is explored along three thematic strands. The paper draws particular attention to the major rationales articulated by practitioners; efforts to set in motion an in-depth debate within an international group; and planners' experiences with regard to the concept's applicability.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and his colleague Mitchell Reardon for polishing up the English. The author would also like to thank the members of the Expert Group for their inputs and interesting viewpoints and most importantly for their great collaboration and enthusiasm. A special thanks goes to the initiator of this Expert Group, Hans Hede, who recently retired from the Office of Regional Planning of the Stockholm County Council. In addition, the author would like to express thanks to Susan Brockett (Plan and Process, Hakadal, Norway) who has excellently facilitated and moderated the all in all five workshops within this group.
Notes
1 These are the official ‘English names’ of the metropolitan areas according to the members of the Expert Group.
2 METREX provides a platform for the exchange of knowledge, expertise and experience on metropolitan affairs, and joint action on issues of common interest. The Network has members from some 50 metropolitan regions and areas and partners in many others.