491
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Planning System

The New Spatial Planning Act in Taiwan: A Messy Shift from Economic Development-Oriented Planning to Environmental Conservation-Oriented Planning?

ORCID Icon
Pages 120-130 | Published online: 01 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

On 18 December 2015, the spatial planning bill was finally passed by the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan. That was a special moment for planning community and authority since they had anticipated this moment for more than two decades. However, this is not the end of the story. On the contrary, the battle between the economic development promoters and environmental conservation supporters just starts. The Act introduces several new changes to secure its goal of nationwide sustainable development, but the introduction also raises some tensions. This article reviews the tensions and their socio-political context, and gives some suggestions to the Taiwanese government.

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Professor Vincent Nadin and Professor Tsulung Chou for their insightful suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. By 2015, there are 775,258 farm households and 2,698,000 farmers, while there are 8,427,842 households and 23,346,728 persons in Taiwan. Overall, 87% of the farm households own all of their cultivated land. The average farm size is 1.02 ha per household and 81.79% of the farm household’s farm size is less than one hectare (COA, Citation2017).

2. Since 2001, the national government has authorized local government to review the change of non-urban land use if the area size of the project is smaller than 10 hectares. In 2009, the authorized size has been extended to 30 hectares.

3. According to the most recent list of National Spatial Planning Committee members in 2018, there is one more member representing civil groups comparing to the list in 2017 (see https://www.cpami.gov.tw/審議委員會/內政部國土計畫審議會/28607-106年度「國土計畫審議會」委員名單.html; accessed 15 January 2018). It shows a very limited improvement in response to the suggestion of Ken-cheng Lee.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 396.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.