348
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Baseline King–Devick scores for adults are not generalizable; however, age and education influence scores

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1813-1819 | Received 05 Jul 2016, Accepted 19 Jun 2017, Published online: 08 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: To establish normative values for the King–Devick (K–D) test to be used as a reference for determining impairment related to concussion when individual baseline scores are lacking. Method: Baseline K–D scores were collected for 243 participants aged 18–86.

Results: The mean age of subjects was 40.46; range 18–86 years. The mean time was 42.2 seconds; 26.19–75.96 seconds. There was a relationship (r = 0.376) between K–D score and age; scores increased (worsened) with age. There was also a relationship between score and education with scores decreasing as education increased (r = −0.194; p = 0.002). The K–D score was not influenced by sex or concussion history. A regression equation using education and age to predict K–D time explained 0.418 of the variance in K–D test time.

Conclusion: Although this research established a relationship between K–D score and age and education, the range in scores was too broad to establish normative values. In the absence of a baseline score, the use of a regression equation considering age and education level may provide some indication of expected score. However, the most reliable use of the test as a screen for impairment following concussion involves the use of a baseline test.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank two separate groups of Neumann Doctorate of Physical Therapy students for their essential contributions to this research study in data collection: Katie Angelucci, Jessica Lentz, Gregory Carroll, Patricia Byrne, Courtney Bush, Shannon Morris, Bryan Miller, Alison Spiler and Christine McHale.

Financial disclosure

This study did not receive any financial support from entities outside of Neumann University.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors neither have any conflicts of interests nor any disclosures to report.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

Not applicable.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.