300
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factor analysis of the adolescent version of the behavioural assessment screening tool (BAST-A) in adolescents with concussion

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 130-137 | Received 01 Apr 2020, Accepted 26 Nov 2020, Published online: 29 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Develop and validate the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for Adolescents with brain injury.

Setting: Concussion clinics

Participants: Adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury 3 months after initial concussion clinic visit (n = 138).

Design: Assessment development and validation (cross-sectional cohort) study

Main Measures: Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool – Adolescent

Results: Expert panel members added or modified items specific to adolescents to the original Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for adults. The Content Validity Index was 97.2%. Exploratory factor analysis of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool – Adolescent reduced the initial 70 items to 46 primary items with a 3-factor solution: Negative Affect & Fatigue, Executive & Social Function, and Risk Behaviors. Internal consistency reliabilities ranged from good to excellent for all factors (Cronbach’s α =.80-.95). We retained four secondary maladaptive coping items (from an initial six), though these require further modification and testing (Cronbach’s α =.67).

Conclusion: The Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for Adolescents, a measure of neurobehavioral symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents, has a multidimensional factor structure with evidence of good internal consistency reliabilities. Future work will further evaluate its convergent and discriminant validity and employ item response theory analyses for validation in a new sample of adolescents with concussion.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of our expert panel members and the adolescents and their families who are part of our ConTex registry.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Texas Institute for Brain Injury and Repair (TIBIR), a state-funded initiative as part of the Peter J. O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and by CTSA NIH Grant UL1TR001105.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.