ABSTRACT
Background
Sleep and wakefulness disturbances are common with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, there are no condition-specific measures to evaluate sleep following TBI.
Objective
To assess the convergent validity of the Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire (SCQ), a condition-specific (TBI) measure is compared to polysomnography and existing self-report sleep questionnaires.
Participants Included
Thirty-two adults diagnosed with mild TBI, 3–24 months post-injury, average age, 38.9 years, predominantly female (63%) and with symptoms of chronic insomnia.
Methods
Participants underwent polysomnographic evaluation of sleep and completed the SCQ, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s correlations. The sample was sufficiently powered (0.85) to detect a moderate to strong correlation of 0.5 or greater.
Results
SCQ sub-questions were meaningfully correlated with corresponding objective sleep parameters (time awake, number of awakenings, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset) as measured with polysomnography. Additional significant correlations were seen between total scores on the SCQ and ISI and between SCQ sub questions and total ESS scores.
Conclusions
This work provides initial evidence of the convergent validity of the SCQ with objective sleep parameters and existing self-report measures in patients after mild TBI.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Marie-Christine Ouellet PhD to the development of the SCQ. We also acknowledge the contributions of Brian Murray MD, FRCPC, D,ABSM, to the conceptualization of the analysis.
Data availability
The data from this study will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
CWH developed the SCQ (with consultation from Marie-Christine Ouellet, PhD). DMZ and CWH conceptualized the study. DMZ conducted the study and collected all data. DT designed and conducted statistical analyses. DT and CWH interpreted the analysis and drafted the manuscript. DMZ critically reviewed the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.