1,014
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Speech production and speech perception in children with speech sound disorder

, , &
Pages 183-202 | Received 27 Oct 2020, Accepted 17 Jun 2021, Published online: 19 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship between speech production (SP) and speech perception in children with Speech Sound Disorder (SSD) from both typical speech production (TSP) and child’s own atypical speech production (ASP). Ten children with SSD were evaluated by a speech production task (naming test) and two speech perception tasks (phonological contrast identification) using the PERCEFAL instrument. In the identification task, the acoustic stimulus, from typical and child’s own atypical speech productions, was presented to each child, and they needed to choose the corresponding stimulus between two pictures displayed on the computer screen. The percentages of errors on speech production (SP) task, on the identification task from TSP and ASP were calculated for each child. ANOVA showed a significant difference between speech production and speech perception. Post hoc analysis demonstrated a greater mean of errors in the ASP compared to the mean of errors in the TSP and SP performances. Only SP and ASP performances presented a significant correlation (r = 0.65). Errors involving manner and manner+place were most recurring in SP. TSP seems to precede SP; that is, children with SSD perceive more speech from typical production than they are able to produce. The significant correlation between ASP and SP suggests that the evaluation of these skills accesses the children’s equivalent underlying phonological representation. A more accurate production, such as typical production, may have cues that help children with SSD to identify phonological contrasts, even if their underlying representations are overly broad or not established.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Notes

1 1It is important to highlight that, although /R/ in syllable onset is treated as a liquid in BP, phonetically, this phoneme is seen as a posterior fricative with numerous allophones. The /R/ phoneme is variously produced as an unvoiced or voiced fricative that may be velar [x] or [ɣ], uvular [χ] or [ʁ], or glottal [h] or [ɦ]. The sound production depends on the speaker’s dialectal region of BP as well as individual preferences (Cagliari, Citation2009; Silva, Citation1999).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by FAPESP, São Paulo State research agency [grants no. 2016/08775-0; 2020/03990-5] and by CNPq – National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [grant numbers 429,025/2018-1 and 301,735/2019-0]. This study was also financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 484.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.