3,070
Views
88
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BRIEF REPORTS

Interoceptive awareness in eating disorders: Distinguishing lack of clarity from non-acceptance of internal experience

, , &
Pages 892-902 | Received 09 Sep 2008, Accepted 09 Apr 2009, Published online: 25 Jun 2009
 

Abstract

Poor interoceptive awareness is often cited as a key feature of eating disorders, yet the precise nature of the deficits and their relationship to eating pathology remains unclear. Interoceptive awareness includes both acceptance of affective experience and clarity regarding emotional responses. The aim of the current study was to parse these components and examine the association between these deficits and two representative eating disorder symptoms: dietary restraint and binge eating. Participants were 50 eating disorder patients who completed a medical examination, clinical interview and symptom self-report measures. Results of regression analyses controlling for BMI and illness duration indicated that non-acceptance, not lack of clarity, was significantly associated with dietary restraint. Neither predicted binge eating. Findings suggest that negative reactions to emotional responses may contribute to the development or maintenance of dietary restraint. Results highlight the need to investigate the experience of emotional arousal in individuals with eating disorders using experimental methods that deconstruct the components of interoceptive awareness, and the potential utility of treatments that increase comfort with affective experience for individuals with more restrictive patterns.

Notes

1We know of no published studies that assess interoceptive abilities in eating disorder populations using laboratory-based measures, although there is one recent paper that assesses IA in individuals diagnosed with AN using a heartbeat paradigm (Pollatos et al., Citation2008).

2Non-acceptance of Emotional Responses Subscale score for the women in the Gratz and Roemer (Citation2004) sample: M=11.65, SD=4.72. Non-acceptance of Emotional Responses Subscale score for the men in the Gratz and Roemer (Citation2004) sample: M=11.55, SD=4.20.

3Lack of Clarity Subscale scores for women in the Gratz and Roemer (Citation2004) sample: M=10.61, SD=3.80. Lack of Clarity Subscale scores for men in the Gratz and Roemer (Citation2004) sample: M=10.74, SD=3.67.

4Principle axis factoring with promax oblique rotation was used to extract factors of the DERS. A scree plot was examined to assess adequacy of extraction and number of factors. Only items from the Non-acceptance and Lack of Clarity DERS Subscales were included in the analysis. Items from other, non-relevant DERS subscales (e.g., Impulse Control Difficulties) were not factor analysed.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.