1,550
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REGULAR ARTICLES

Emotions in sexual morality: Testing the separate elicitors of anger and disgust

, , &
Pages 1208-1222 | Received 04 Jan 2011, Accepted 06 Oct 2011, Published online: 13 Mar 2012
 

Abstract

Recent work suggests that negative moral judgements of sexual activities are informed by disgust and anger. A correlational study (N=62) and an experiment (N=176) examined the specific antecedents that elicit these distinct, though correlated, moral emotions. Participants in Study 1 rated their emotional reactions to, and judgements of, 10 sexual scenarios. Across scenarios, judgements of abnormality predicted disgust independent of anger, and judgements of harm/rights violation predicted anger independent of disgust. Study 2 replicated these results in an experimental design. Participants rated their emotions and judgements in response to behaviours that varied in degree of potential sexual morality violation (non-sexual, heterosexual, homosexual) and rights violation (no harm, indirect harm, direct harm). Judgement of rights violation mediated the effects of harm on anger. Judgements of abnormality, but not other antecedents proposed to elicit moral disgust, mediated the effects of sexual immorality on disgust.

Acknowledgments

We would very much like to thank Prof. Niall Bolger for his statistical advice as we revised this article.

Notes

1Because the composite anger and disgust indices were so strongly correlated (r = .79, p < .001), we performed parallel analyses using only the face measures, as in Study 1. Study 2's face measures showed less collinearity than the face-plus-verbal composites, and were correlated to a similar degree as the face measures in Study 1 (r = .66 in Study 2 vs. r = .65 in Study 1, both ps < .001). Both for these ANCOVA analyses and the mediation analyses that follow, analyses using the face-only composite revealed the same pattern of significant results with one exception: the difference between disgust in the non-sexual vs. heterosexual conditions was not significant, nor was the mediation of this effect by abnormality appraisals.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.