435
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Reports

Biased interpretation and memory in children with varying levels of spider fear

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 182-192 | Received 23 Mar 2012, Accepted 10 May 2013, Published online: 24 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

This study investigated multiple cognitive biases in children simultaneously, to investigate whether spider-fearful children display an interpretation bias, a recall bias, and source monitoring errors, and whether these biases are specific for spider-related materials. Furthermore, the independent ability of these biases to predict spider fear was investigated. A total of 121 children filled out the Spider Anxiety and Disgust Screening for Children (SADS-C), and they performed an interpretation task, a memory task, and a Behavioural Assessment Test (BAT). As expected, a specific interpretation bias was found: Spider-fearful children showed more negative interpretations of ambiguous spider-related scenarios, but not of other scenarios. We also found specific source monitoring errors: Spider-fearful children made more fear-related source monitoring errors for the spider-related scenarios, but not for the other scenarios. Only limited support was found for a recall bias. Finally, interpretation bias, recall bias, and source monitoring errors predicted unique variance components of spider fear.

The Behavioural Science Institute of Radboud University Nijmegen supported the study financially.

We thank the elementary school that participated in this study. We also thank the children and their parents who participated in the study. We are also grateful to the reviewers for helpful comments, to Paula Hertel for her help with the development of the interpretation task and the memory task, and to Liesbeth Linssen for her assistance with data analysis.

The Behavioural Science Institute of Radboud University Nijmegen supported the study financially.

We thank the elementary school that participated in this study. We also thank the children and their parents who participated in the study. We are also grateful to the reviewers for helpful comments, to Paula Hertel for her help with the development of the interpretation task and the memory task, and to Liesbeth Linssen for her assistance with data analysis.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.