Abstract
It has been argued that anxious individuals orient their attention initially towards and then away from threat; this pattern is known as vigilance-avoidance. While the mechanisms underlying the initial vigilance have been subject to intense speculation and study, mechanisms underlying any subsequent avoidance have been neglected, although it has often been assumed that avoidance is a controlled coping strategy. Using a correlational design, the present study assessed avoidance in a dot-probe task, along with anxiety and two aspects of goal-driven executive control: Shifting and inhibition. Avoidance of threat correlated with state of anxiety; separate from this, avoidance also correlated negatively with shifting performance and was unrelated to inhibition performance. In other words, avoidance appeared to represent a shifting failure in this study. These results suggest that avoidance may occur ballistically in any individual as a consequence of threat exposure and does not necessarily represent a controlled coping response.
I am grateful to Püren D. Şenyuva and S. Aslıhan Tüzün for their assistance with data collection, and to Nazlı Balkır, Müjde Peker and Dinkar Sharma for their comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by Işık University [under BAP grant 11B101].
I am grateful to Püren D. Şenyuva and S. Aslıhan Tüzün for their assistance with data collection, and to Nazlı Balkır, Müjde Peker and Dinkar Sharma for their comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by Işık University [under BAP grant 11B101].
Notes
1 Note that other studies have found vigilance for threat at these cue durations; see Bar-Haim et al. (Citation2007).
2 I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for drawing this analogy.